ASTER3: The Value of Surgical Mediastinal Staging in Clinical N1 Lung Cancer

Sponsor
Johnny Moons (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02222194
Collaborator
(none)
105
10
33.9
10.5
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In case of PET or CT based cN1 (suspected) NSCLC, ESTS guidelines propose mediastinal staging by echo-endoscopy OR mediastinoscopy. Recent data show a sensitivity of less than 50% for echo-endoscopy to detect N2 disease in cN1 NSCLC patients, while prevalence of mediastinal nodal disease was 24% (unpublished data Aster II).2 The investigators plan to perform a prospective multicentric observational study to measure the sensitivity of mediastinal staging by video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) in cN1 operable and resectable (suspected) NSCLC patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    Few reports in the literature evaluated the final pathological stage distribution of patients with resectable and operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with clinical stage cN1. These retrospective series demonstrated that patients with computed tomography (CT) based cN1 often had clinically occult mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2/3 disease). Hishida et al. reported that 30% of 143 patients with cN1 were diagnosed N2/3 by mediastinoscopy3. Watanabe et al. reported that 37% of 168 patients with cN1 were diagnosed N2/3 by mediastinoscopy 4. Adding FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) to CT might enable the detection of N2/3 disease among these cN1 patients, but negative PET findings do not necessarily exclude N2/3 disease. Kim et al reported that 19,2 % of 99 patients with cN1, in whom cN2 was ruled out by PET-CT scan, were found to have pathologic N2 disease at pulmonary resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection.5 In conclusion, 20-30% of patients with cN1 nodes on imaging, and normal sized FDG-negative mediastinal lymph nodes on CT and PET have malignant involvement in their mediastinal nodes.

    The ACCP guidelines state that invasive preoperative mediastinal staging should be performed in these cN1 patients 6. The updated ESTS guidelines recommend mediastinal staging by echo-endoscopic or mediastinoscopy.1 Non-randomized trials suggested the potential of linear endosonography for mediastinal staging 7-9. However, the patients with cN1 disease form only a minority in these studies. A recently performed prospective ASTER 2 trial (N=100) showed a sensitivity of echo-endoscopic for mediastinal staging of 38% (ITT analysis), while the prevalence of mediastinal nodal disease was 24% (unpublished data Aster 2) 2. The conclusion made by ASTER 2 is that a negative endosonography must be followed by a VAM. However, the investigators consider such double approach not cost-effective in a setting with N2 prevalence <30%. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform a VAM instead of an endosonography in cN1 patients, which is one of the proposed strategies in the recent ESTS guidelines.1 However, there is no prospective study to date that assessed the sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of VAM in a well-defined group of cN1 patients.

    Several publications have demonstrated a lobe-specific mediastinal nodal drainage for upper versus lower lobe NSCLC. Shapiro et al conclude that in early lung cancer, including cN1 disease, lobe-specific mediastinal dissection is warranted 10. However, in this study the only patient with a positive subcarinal node, upper lobe tumour, and negative superior mediastinal nodes had positive N1 nodes. To the investigators knowledge there is no study focussing on mediastinal nodal dissemination patterns in cN1 patients.

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    105 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Prospective
    Official Title:
    Assessment of Surgical Mediastinal sTaging in cN1 Lung canceR
    Study Start Date :
    Aug 1, 2014
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Mar 1, 2017
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    May 30, 2017

    Arms and Interventions

    Arm Intervention/Treatment
    VAM

    Patients with operable and resectable cT1-2-selected T3 cN1cM0 NSCLC undergo VAM for mediastinal lymph node staging. After VAM, patients without tissue proof of N2/3 disease at surgical staging undergo a VATS or thoracotomy with systematic lymph node dissection during the same anaesthesia or at a later stage. Sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of staging with VAM will be calculated. Provided N2 lymph node metastases are proven by VAM the patient goes off study protocol and can further be assessed/treated according to local clinical practice.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Sensitivity of VAM [at surgery (VAM)]

      Sensitivity (%) of surgical mediastinal staging by video-assisted mediastinoscopy in clinical N1; true positives (TP) = cN1 and pN1 - false negatives (FP) = cN1 and pN2/3; sensitivity is calculated as TP / (TP+FN)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Prevalence of N2/3 disease after VAM [at surgery (VAM)]

      % of patients with cN1 disease who show pN2/3 disease after VAM

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 90 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    (Suspected) NSCLC Medical operable and surgical resectable cT1, cT2 selected cT3 (i.e. intraparenchymal tumour >7cm, T3 chest wall, or T3 based on additional nodule in the lobe of the primary tumour) cN1 based on CT or PET 18 years or older Informed Consent

    Exclusion Criteria:

    History of mediastinoscopy No integrated FDG PET/CT available No videomediastinoscopy available EBUS/EUS for mediastinal staging of present N1 disease cN2: mediastinal nodes enlarged on CT or Pet positive invasion of mediastinal pleura invasion of phrenic nerve invasion of parietal pericardium tumour in main bronchus less than 2cm form the main carina cT4 cM1 former therapy for lung cancer (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) technical contraindication for videomediastinoscopy ( eg extreme kyphosis, cutaneous tracheostomy, extreme goiter) pregnancy inability to consent

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium 3000
    2 Aix-Marseille University & Hospitals System of Marseille (AP-HM) Marseille France 13915
    3 ELK Berlin Chest Hospital Berlin Germany 13125
    4 Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg Freiburg Germany 79106
    5 Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz Koblenz Germany 56073
    6 Katholisches Klinikum, Thoraxchirurgie Koblenz Germany 56073
    7 Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa Barcelona Spain 08017
    8 Hospital Clinic; Barcelona University Barcelona Spain 08036
    9 University Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery Zurich Switzerland 8091
    10 Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Istanbul Turkey 81080

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Johnny Moons

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Herbert Decaluwé, MD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Johnny Moons, Data Manager / Clinical Trial Coordinator, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02222194
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ASTER 3
    First Posted:
    Aug 21, 2014
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by Johnny Moons, Data Manager / Clinical Trial Coordinator, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 25, 2017