Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Arterial Line Placement by Emergency Medicine Interns

Sponsor
Temple University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03326739
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
35.9
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Critically ill patients in the emergency department commonly require arterial line placement for continuous direct blood pressure monitoring, frequent arterial blood gas sampling, and frequent blood sampling. Trans-radial catheterization has been shown to reduce access site complications and increase patient comfort compared to trans-femoral access. Radial artery access on the first attempt is optimal; attempts at reentry delay care and increase the risk of vascular spasm, hematoma, infection, neurovascular injury, and pain. The traditional pulse palpation method of radial artery cannulation can be challenging, especially in patients with weak pulses (i.e. morbidly obese or hypotensive individuals).

A review of literature suggests that ultrasound guided trans-radial catheterization compared to standard pulse palpation reduces access time and increases rate of first-entry success when performed by physicians trained in ultrasound. Thus, complications ascribed to reentry are prevented and timely care is provided.

To the investigator's knowledge, only one other prospective study has been conducted to assess the utility of ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in the emergency department. Due to the paucity of literature to support the use of ultrasound guided trans-radial catheterization in critically ill patients, the study will aim to provide further data on the topic. Both techniques are considered standard of care.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Arterial Line Placement
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department 18 years old or greater, who do not belong to a vulnerable group, requiring arterial line placement will be included in this trial. The investigators will randomize each patient into LM vs US. Data collected will include number of attempts, success rate, and time for procedure to be completed. PGY-1 residents will perform the arterial line placement.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Arterial Line Placement by Emergency Medicine Interns
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Ultrasound Guided A-Line Placement

Patients in this group will have ultrasound guided arterial line placement.

Procedure: Arterial Line Placement
arterial line placement

Active Comparator: Landmark Guided A-line Placement

Patients in this group will have landmark guided arterial line placement.

Procedure: Arterial Line Placement
arterial line placement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Superiority of Method of arterial line placement [1 day]

    Number of attempts until successful cannulation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Success of method [1 day]

    Completion of arterial line placement after three attempts

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients requiring arterial line placement.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Adults Unable to Consent

  • Members of Vulnerable Populations

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19140

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Temple University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ryan C Gibbons, MD, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Temple University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03326739
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 24642
First Posted:
Oct 31, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jan 22, 2020
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 22, 2020