Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port Implantation

Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT01584193
Collaborator
(none)
0
1
2
18
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture
  • Procedure: Cephalic vein dissection
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Implementation: a Single-center Controlled Randomized Superiority Trial
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: US-guided subclavian vein puncture

Procedure: Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture
Central venous access port implementation through ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture and Seldinger technique
Other Names:
  • US-guided
  • Seldinger technique
  • Active Comparator: Cephalic vein dissection

    Procedure: Cephalic vein dissection
    Central venous access port implementation through cephalic vein dissection and cutdown
    Other Names:
  • Venous cutdown
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. surgical procedure time [during surgical procedure]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. primary implementation success rate [during surgical procedure]

    2. overall implementation success rate [during surgical procedure]

    3. technique conversion rate and causes [during surgical procedure]

    4. pain during surgical procedure [during surgical procedure]

    5. pain at 5 days [5 days post-procedure]

    6. Pain at 30 days [30 days post-procedure]

    7. Complications rate during surgical procedure [during surgical procedure]

      catheter malposition, hemorrhage, hemotoma, hemothorax, pneumothorax

    8. Complications rate at 5 days [5 days post-procedure]

      hematoma, infection, symptomatic venous thrombosis, pneumothorax

    9. Complications rate at 30 days [30 days post-procedure]

      infection, symptomatic venous thrombosis, pneumothorax, venous access port dysfunction

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age > 18

    • Informed consent

    • Need for central venous access port implementation under local anesthesia

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Impaired blood clotting

    • Ongoing antiplatelet drugs therapy, except acetylsalicylic acid

    • Trauma or surgical past history on both shoulder girdles

    • Known central venous thrombosis (subclavian vein, upper vena cava)

    • Known pneumothorax

    • Septic state

    • Agranulocytosis

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University Hospital Lausanne, Department of Visceral Surgery Lausanne Vaud Switzerland 1011

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Lausanne Hospitals

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Nicolas Demartines, University Hospital Lausanne, Department of Visceral Surgery

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Nicolas DEMARTINES, Professor, University of Lausanne Hospitals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01584193
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CHV 46/11
    First Posted:
    Apr 24, 2012
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 23, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2018
    Keywords provided by Nicolas DEMARTINES, Professor, University of Lausanne Hospitals

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 23, 2018