Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RAD1901 in Postmenopausal Women With Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical safety of RAD1901 and to evaluate whether RAD1901 reduced the frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS; "hot flashes") in postmenopausal women.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
This was a Phase 2b outpatient, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether elacestrant reduces the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms (VMS; "hot flashes") in postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flashes. Postmenopausal women who met study criteria were followed for 12 weeks on double-blind study medication and two weeks off study medication.
Treatment was randomized 1:1:1:1 to ensure that an approximately equal number of patients were exposed to each of three RAD1901 (elacestrant) doses (5, 10 and 20 mg/day) or placebo. The total period of placebo exposure was 14 weeks.
Enrolling approximately 300 patients was expected to provide power for testing superiority of the primary efficacy endpoint outcomes.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg/day |
Drug: RAD1901
RAD1901
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg/day |
Drug: RAD1901
RAD1901
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg/day |
Drug: RAD1901
RAD1901
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Regimen 4 Placebo |
Other: Placebo
Placebo
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes [Baseline and 12 weeks]
Change from baseline to week 12 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. Severity of hot flashes was self-assessed and reported as follows: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating Moderate: sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity Severe: sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes [Baseline and 4 weeks]
Change from baseline to week 4 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 4 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.
- Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot Flashes [Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks]
Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average daily severity of hot flashes, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash severity. Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per day using an electronic diary. Daily severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of the number of mild hot flashes, plus 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. That is, Daily Severity Score = (Fmild + 2•Fmod + 3•Fsev)/(Fmild + Fmod + Fsev) where Fmild= frequency of mild hot flashes, Fmod = frequency of moderate hot flashes, Fsev = frequency of severe hot flashes. The measure is a weighted average of the frequencies of Hot Flashes.
- Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot Flashes [Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks]
Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average number of all hot flashes (mild, moderate, and severe) by eDiary, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
To have participated in this study, a subject MUST:
-
be a postmenopausal woman between 40 and 65 years of age, inclusive
-
be seeking relief or treatment for moderate to severe VMS
-
be willing to discontinue and abstain from the following: vaginal hormonal products; transdermal or oral estrogen or estrogen/progestin combination; progestin implants; injectable estrogen; topical progesterone cream, selective estrogen receptor modulators and intrauterine devices (IUDs)
-
have no clinically significant abnormalities on pelvic exam except for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA)
-
have a normal or clinically insignificant transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) with an endometrial thickness <4 mm at screening
-
have a normal endometrial biopsy subsequent to the TVU without clinically relevant results
-
have a normal screening Papanicolaou (Pap) smear
-
have a mammogram within 9 months prior to randomization. Subjects must have had a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammography result of 1 or 2 to enroll.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with any of the following characteristics were not be eligible to participate in the study:
-
have a history of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, melanoma or any gynecologic cancer.
-
using any of the following:
-
oral estrogen-, progestin-, androgen-, or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening (visit 1)
-
transdermal hormone products within 4 weeks before screening (visit 1)
-
vaginal hormone products (rings, creams, gels) within 4 weeks before screening (visit 1)
-
progestin implants/injectables, IUDs or estrogen pellets/injectables within 6 months before screening (visit 1)
-
anabolic steroids
-
have been treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist within the last year
-
have been treated with anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors within 2 months prior to study entry
-
have been concurrently treated and will abstain from gabapentin and paroxetine or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for VMS or other indications for 3 months during the trial and have not taken within 4 weeks prior to screening
-
have unexplained vaginal bleeding within the 3 months prior to study entry
-
have an endometrial biopsy at baseline with a diagnosis by a gynecologic pathologist of proliferative, hyperplasia, polyp or cancer
-
have unresolved cervical cytological smear report of atypical glandular or squamous cells of undetermined significance. Cervical cytologic smear report of ASCUS, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or greater, or any reported dysplasia
-
have unresolved findings suspicious for malignancy on the breast examination
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Women's Health Care Specialists P.C. - Beyer Research | Kalamazoo | Michigan | United States | 49009 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Radius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Investigators
- Study Director: Clinical Operations, Radius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- VMRAD1901-203
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 | Regimen 2 | Regimen 3 | Regimen 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||||
STARTED | 38 | 34 | 29 | 38 |
COMPLETED | 37 | 32 | 26 | 33 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 38 | 34 | 28 | 38 | 138 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
56.6
(4.83)
|
55.4
(5.08)
|
54.1
(4.07)
|
53.9
(5.09)
|
55.1
(4.9)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||||
Female |
38
100%
|
34
100%
|
28
100%
|
38
100%
|
138
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||||
Hispanic or Latino |
8
21.1%
|
8
23.5%
|
7
25%
|
6
15.8%
|
29
21%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
30
78.9%
|
26
76.5%
|
21
75%
|
32
84.2%
|
109
79%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
2.6%
|
0
0%
|
1
3.6%
|
1
2.6%
|
3
2.2%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
6
15.8%
|
12
35.3%
|
6
21.4%
|
10
26.3%
|
34
24.6%
|
White |
30
78.9%
|
22
64.7%
|
21
75%
|
27
71.1%
|
100
72.5%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1
2.6%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||||
United States |
38
100%
|
34
100%
|
28
100%
|
38
100%
|
138
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline to week 12 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. Severity of hot flashes was self-assessed and reported as follows: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating Moderate: sensation of heat with sweating, able to continue activity Severe: sensation of heat with sweating, causing cessation of activity. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The modified intent to treat (mITT) population was used. This included all patients in the safety population who had recorded hot flash data in their eDiaries for at least 5 days during baseline and for at least one day while on double-blind study medication, and was the primary analysis population for all efficacy analyses |
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 | Regimen 2 | Regimen 3 | Regimen 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo |
Measure Participants | 38 | 34 | 28 | 38 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [moderate to severe hot flashes per day] |
-3.48
(0.793)
|
-3.74
(0.867)
|
-4.12
(0.944)
|
-3.66
(0.808)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Regimen 1, Regimen 4 |
---|---|---|
Comments | Regimen 1 = 5 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.18 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Regimen 2, Regimen 4 |
---|---|---|
Comments | Regimen 2 = 10 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 0.08 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Regimen 3, Regimen 4 |
---|---|---|
Comments | Regimen 3 = 20 mg vs Regimen 4 = placebo | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 0.46 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline to week 4 in the average number of moderate and severe hot flashes per day, where change is calculated as week 4 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
mITT population |
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo |
Measure Participants | 38 | 34 | 28 | 38 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [moderate to severe hot flashes per day] |
-1.15
(3.644)
|
-2.22
(4.872)
|
-2.70
(3.764)
|
-3
(4.075)
|
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Severity of Hot Flashes |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average daily severity of hot flashes, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash severity. Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per day using an electronic diary. Daily severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of the number of mild hot flashes, plus 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. That is, Daily Severity Score = (Fmild + 2•Fmod + 3•Fsev)/(Fmild + Fmod + Fsev) where Fmild= frequency of mild hot flashes, Fmod = frequency of moderate hot flashes, Fsev = frequency of severe hot flashes. The measure is a weighted average of the frequencies of Hot Flashes. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
mITT population |
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo |
Measure Participants | 38 | 34 | 28 | 38 |
Week 4 change from baseline in severity |
-0.04
(0.25)
|
-0.07
(0.26)
|
-0.13
(0.273)
|
-0.00
(0.280)
|
Week 12 change from baseline in severity |
-0.09
(0.337)
|
-0.08
(0.373)
|
-0.13
(0.313)
|
-0.01
(0.409)
|
Title | Change From Baseline to Week 4 and Week 12 in the Frequency of All Hot Flashes |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline to week 4 and week 12 in the average number of all hot flashes (mild, moderate, and severe) by eDiary, where change is calculated as week 4 or week 12 minus baseline so that negative values indicate a reduction (improvement) of hot flash frequency. |
Time Frame | Baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
mITT population |
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo |
Measure Participants | 38 | 34 | 28 | 38 |
Week 4 change from baseline |
-0.99
(3.803)
|
-2.23
(4.792)
|
-2.29
(3.754)
|
-3.27
(4.107)
|
Week 12 change from baseline |
-3.47
(5.076)
|
-2.40
(3.560)
|
-3.91
(5.263)
|
-3.74
(4.228)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Up to 14 weeks | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||||||
Arm/Group Title | Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo | ||||
Arm/Group Description | RAD1901 5 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 10 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | RAD1901 20 mg RAD1901: RAD1901 | Placebo Placebo: Placebo | ||||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||||
Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/38 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | ||||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||||
Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/38 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | ||||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||||
Regimen 1 RAD1901 5 mg | Regimen 2 RAD1901 10 mg | Regimen 3 RAD1901 20 mg | Regimen 4 Placebo | |||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 11/38 (28.9%) | 3/34 (8.8%) | 7/29 (24.1%) | 13/38 (34.2%) | ||||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||||
Nausea | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 4/38 (10.5%) | ||||
Diarrhoea | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/34 (0%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Dyspepsia | 0/38 (0%) | 1/34 (2.9%) | 2/29 (6.9%) | 1/38 (2.6%) | ||||
Abdominal Pain | 0/38 (0%) | 1/34 (2.9%) | 0/29 (0%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
General disorders | ||||||||
Chills | 0/38 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Infections and infestations | ||||||||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 1/38 (2.6%) | 0/34 (0%) | 2/29 (6.9%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Sinusitis | 0/38 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||||
Back pain | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/34 (2.9%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | ||||
Arthralgia | 2/38 (5.3%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | ||||
Pain in extremity | 0/38 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||||
Headache | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/34 (2.9%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 2/38 (5.3%) | ||||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||||
Insomnia | 2/38 (5.3%) | 0/34 (0%) | 0/29 (0%) | 0/38 (0%) | ||||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||||||
Vaginal haemorrhage | 2/38 (5.3%) | 1/34 (2.9%) | 1/29 (3.4%) | 4/38 (10.5%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Operations |
---|---|
Organization | Radius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Phone | 617-551-4000 |
clinopsinfo@radiuspharm.com |
- VMRAD1901-203