Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes

Sponsor
Amgen (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01890109
Collaborator
(none)
103
7
2
9.9
14.7
1.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of moderate to severe daily hot flashes 4 weeks after a single dose of erenumab (AMG 334) in women with hot flashes associated with menopause.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: Erenumab
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase 1

Detailed Description

This study will test the hypothesis that the vasodilation associated with capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (DBF) provides a good model for the vasodilation associated with hot flashes; therefore erenumab doses that cause DBF inhibition will be safe and well tolerated, and will be effective in the reduction of the frequency and/or severity of HFs.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
103 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Randomized, Stratified, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of AMG 334 in Women With Hot Flashes Associated With Menopause
Actual Study Start Date :
May 13, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 11, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 11, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection.

Drug: Placebo
Administered via subcutaneous injection

Experimental: Erenumab

Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.

Biological: Erenumab
Administered via subcutaneous injection.
Other Names:
  • AMG 334
  • Aimovig™
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes [Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)]

      The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating, mild flushing; Moderate: sensation of heat, face flushed, slightly clammy, some sweating, able to continue activity, may want to remove layers of clothing or covers at night; Severe: sensation of heat with more severe sweating, have to stop current activity, may have to change clothing. Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean. The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[BL]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity Score [Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)]

      The daily severity score was calculated according to the following: (Number of mild hot flashes * 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes * 2) + (number of severe hot flashes * 3). The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27. The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[baseline]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.

    2. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [16 weeks]

      A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: fatal life threatening required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect. other medically important serious event A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) is any treatment-emergent adverse event that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the study drug.

    3. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single Dose [Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose]

      Blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.

    4. Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single Dose [Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose]

    5. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Erenumab [Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose]

    6. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Erenumab [Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose]

    7. Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Erenumab [Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose]

    8. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation [16 weeks]

      The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions: Have you wished you were dead or wished you could go to sleep and not wake up? Have you actually had any thoughts of killing yourself?

    9. Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose [16 weeks]

      Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    45 Years to 65 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • female subjects with hot flashes associated with menopause between 45 and 65 years of age, inclusive, with no history or evidence of clinically relevant medical disorders as determined by the investigator in consultation with the Amgen physician.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • History or evidence of clinically significant disorder (including psychiatric), condition or disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Amgen physician would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Research Site San Diego California United States 92108
    2 Research Site Miami Florida United States 33186
    3 Research Site Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
    4 Eugene Andruczyk Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19114
    5 Research Site Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19114
    6 Research Site Mount Pleasant South Carolina United States 29464
    7 Research Site Seattle Washington United States 98105

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Amgen

    Investigators

    • Study Director: MD, Amgen

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Amgen
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01890109
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20120180
    First Posted:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 14, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2019
    Keywords provided by Amgen
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details This study was conducted at 6 centers in the United States from 13 May 2013 to 11 March 2014. Screening included completion of a 7-day diary to record hot flashes.
    Pre-assignment Detail Participants meeting the eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to erenumab or placebo. Participants were stratified based on the average number of hot flashes per 24 hours during the screening period (≤ 11.5 or > 11.5).
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 52 51
    Received Study Treatment 52 50
    COMPLETED 51 46
    NOT COMPLETED 1 5

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab Total
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 52 50 102
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    55.5
    (4.8)
    55.6
    (3.8)
    55.6
    (4.3)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    52
    100%
    50
    100%
    102
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    Hispanic or Latino
    6
    11.5%
    8
    16%
    14
    13.7%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    46
    88.5%
    42
    84%
    88
    86.3%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    1
    2%
    1
    1%
    Asian
    1
    1.9%
    0
    0%
    1
    1%
    Black or African American
    15
    28.8%
    10
    20%
    25
    24.5%
    Mixed Race
    0
    0%
    1
    2%
    1
    1%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    2
    4%
    2
    2%
    White
    36
    69.2%
    36
    72%
    72
    70.6%
    Number of Hot Flashes at Baseline (Count of Participants)
    ≤ 11.5 hot flashes/24 hours
    26
    50%
    25
    50%
    51
    50%
    > 11.5 hot flashes/24 hours
    26
    50%
    25
    50%
    51
    50%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes
    Description The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating, mild flushing; Moderate: sensation of heat, face flushed, slightly clammy, some sweating, able to continue activity, may want to remove layers of clothing or covers at night; Severe: sensation of heat with more severe sweating, have to stop current activity, may have to change clothing. Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean. The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[BL]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
    Time Frame Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants for whom at least 1 postdose hot flash response measure was recorded.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 52 50
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
    0.35
    0.38
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Erenumab
    Comments Repeated measures analysis of covariance was performed on the log transformed ratio to baseline of the number of daily moderate to severe hot flashes. Independent variables included treatment, week, and the treatment-by-week interaction; subject served as a random effect; and the log transformed baseline number of daily moderate to severe hot flashes was used as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.723
    Comments
    Method Repeated Measures Analysis of Covariance
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Square Geometric Mean Ratio
    Estimated Value 1.10
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.66 to 1.83
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity Score
    Description The daily severity score was calculated according to the following: (Number of mild hot flashes * 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes * 2) + (number of severe hot flashes * 3). The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27. The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[baseline]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
    Time Frame Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants for whom at least 1 postdose hot flash response measure was recorded.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 52 50
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [ratio]
    0.40
    0.45
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Placebo, Erenumab
    Comments Repeated measures analysis of covariance was performed on the log transformed ratio to baseline of the daily hot flash severity score. Independent variables included treatment, week, and the treatment-by-week interaction; subject served as a random effect; and the log transformed baseline daily hot flash severity score was used as a covariate.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.551
    Comments
    Method Repeated Measures Analysis of Covariance
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Least Square Geometric Mean Ratio
    Estimated Value 1.14
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.74 to 1.74
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
    Description A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: fatal life threatening required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect. other medically important serious event A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) is any treatment-emergent adverse event that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the study drug.
    Time Frame 16 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received study drug
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 52 50
    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
    23
    44.2%
    24
    48%
    Serious adverse events
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    TEAE leading to discontinuation of study
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Fatal adverse events
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)
    5
    9.6%
    3
    6%
    Treatment-related serious adverse events
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    TRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    TRAE leading to discontinuation of study
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Treatment-related fatal adverse events
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single Dose
    Description Blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.
    Time Frame Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 50
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [μg/mL]
    6.13
    (2.86)
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single Dose
    Description
    Time Frame Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 50
    Median (Full Range) [days]
    7.0
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Erenumab
    Description
    Time Frame Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 50
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [day*μg/mL]
    173
    (84.6)
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Erenumab
    Description
    Time Frame Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated. AUCinf could not be accurately estimated for 23 participants who are excluded from the analysis.
    Arm/Group Title Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 27
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [day*μg/mL]
    190
    (96.3)
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Erenumab
    Description
    Time Frame Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received erenumab and for whom at least 1 PK parameter or endpoint could be adequately estimated. T1/2 could not be accurately estimated for 23 participants who are excluded from the analysis. The terminal half-life calculated from this single dose study may not be representative of a clinically relevant half-life of erenumab.
    Arm/Group Title Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 27
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [days]
    12.1
    (3.00)
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation
    Description The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions: Have you wished you were dead or wished you could go to sleep and not wake up? Have you actually had any thoughts of killing yourself?
    Time Frame 16 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received study drug
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 52 50
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose
    Description Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
    Time Frame 16 weeks

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    All participants who received study drug.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    Measure Participants 52 50
    Binding antibody positive
    0
    0%
    5
    10%
    Neutralizing antibody positive
    0
    0%
    4
    8%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame 16 Weeks
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
    Arm/Group Title Placebo Erenumab 70 mg
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
    All Cause Mortality
    Placebo Erenumab 70 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Placebo Erenumab 70 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/52 (0%) 0/50 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Placebo Erenumab 70 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 11/52 (21.2%) 9/50 (18%)
    Infections and infestations
    Upper respiratory tract infection 2/52 (3.8%) 3/50 (6%)
    Urinary tract infection 3/52 (5.8%) 0/50 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 0/52 (0%) 4/50 (8%)
    Back pain 0/52 (0%) 3/50 (6%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 4/52 (7.7%) 3/50 (6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain 3/52 (5.8%) 0/50 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Study Director
    Organization Amgen Inc.
    Phone 866-572-6436
    Email medinfo@amgen.com
    Responsible Party:
    Amgen
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01890109
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 20120180
    First Posted:
    Jul 1, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 14, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2019