ALPIVEINE: Success Rate Comparison of Venipuncture in Children With and Without Near-infrared Light
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the act of venipuncture is more successful on the first attempt using near infrared light compared to a standard puncture on children or newborn whose venous access is considered difficult due to lack of visibility of the veins.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This trial aims to evaluate the act of venipuncture with or without the near-infrared light device for any children requiring a venipuncture for a blood sample in neonatal intensive care and neonatology, and in pediatric emergencies.
For any eligible patient, at least one parent will be approached by a member of the medical or paramedical team trained on the protocol to explain the study to him/her and to be able to include the child during the next venous blood sampling. In case the parent agrees on the child's participation, the investigator is in charge of obtaining an informed consent.
During the next venous blood sampling, the nurse responsible for the patient:
-
Takes the next consecutively numbered randomization envelope from the room intended for this purpose. This envelope is opaque and contains the randomization group in which the child is assigned (near infrared light or standard technique)
-
Takes a study observation book located in the room intended for this purpose.
-
Once the nurse is ready to do the venipuncture and before having identified the vein to be punctured, he/she opens the envelope to find out whether or not near infrared light will be used for spotting the vein to be punctured while the person (caregiver or nurse) who will help him during the collection is present.
-
Venous blood sampling according to the technique indicated by the randomization (near infrared light or standard technique) for the first attempt at venipuncture.
-
If the first venipuncture attempt fails, the nurse can chose to carry out the 2nd or 3rd attempt with or without near infrared light. Only the first 3 attempts progress will be recorded in the observation book.
-
When the venous blood drawing is over, whether it is successful or not, the assistant present during the sampling completes the observation book on the sampling part.
-
The notebook and the envelope used are stored in the room intended for this purpose.
To avoid device-related bias, the AccuVein® AV 400 (CE 0086 marking) was chosen. This device uses near infrared light to detect superficial veins under the skin and then projects an image of these veins onto the skin surface, exactly above the veins. The device will be held between 10 and 20 cm perpendicular to the skin, because at this distance the projected image corresponds to the actual size of the veins located below the skin. It will be either attached to an articulated arm in order to free the operator's hands to perform the procedure, or held by an assistant above the venipuncture site. The assistant can reorient the device during the procedure. The light from the AccuVein® device should not be aimed at the child's eyes. In neonatal intensive care and neonatology, during any use, the newborn's eyes will be covered during the procedure's implementation.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control group Venipuncture without near-infrared light |
|
Experimental: Experimental group Venipuncture with near-infrared light |
Procedure: venipuncture with near-infrared light
with near-infrared light to locate the veins
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of patients with first venipuncture attempt [at day 0]
Obtention 0.5 ml of blood
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Successful venepuncture duration [at day 0]
Duration from application of tourniquet to obtention of 0.5 ml of blood at most after the 3rd venepuncture attempt
- Pain evaluation during venipuncture [at day 0]
Using FLACC or DAN (acute pain of the new-born) scale (score 0 to 10, 10 is most painful) at most after the 3rd venepuncture attempt
- Caregivers's opinion [at day 0]
Opinion of caregivers on the ease of use, effectiveness and their general satisfaction, using a small questionary (very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, satisfied, very satisfied) at most after the 3rd venepuncture attempt
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Any child aged at most 44 weeks + 6 days of corrected term hospitalized in neonatal intensive care and neonatology with a medical prescription for a venous blood sample and whose venipuncture has been considered difficult by an nurse or
-
Any child under the age of 18 in the emergency room with a prescription for a blood test and whose venipuncture was considered difficult by the reception and orientation nurse or a nurse who does not perform the procedure.
-
One parent agreed on their child participation in this study.
-
Patient with health insurance
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hôpital Trousseau | Paris | France | 75012 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Investigators
- Study Director: Ricardo CARBAJAL, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- D20170121
- ID-RCB