Efficacy Study of the Application of Low Level Laser Light to Treat Venous Stasis Ulcers
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether low level laser light therapy is effective as an adjunctive therapy to the healing of venous stasis leg ulcers.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A chronic venous stasis leg ulcer is a wound below the knee that fails to heal within 6 weeks. Venous stasis ulcers account for 80% to 90% of all leg and foot ulcers, affecting an estimated 500,000-600,000 people in the United States every year. Venous stasis ulcers account for the loss of 2 million working days and incur treatment costs around $3 billion dollars annually in the United States. Standard of care for venous stasis ulcers includes compression of the affected leg together with daily dressing changes to minimize swelling; debridement of the ulcer to remove dead tissue and bacteria; and daily wound Care dressing to keep the wound clean. Venous stasis ulcers typically have very lengthy and poor healing rates, with up to 50% remaining open and unhealed for 9 months or longer. Many patients suffer pain and sleep and mobility problems, impairing quality of life. Recurrence rates for venous stasis ulcers is very high, with about one third of treated individuals experiencing 4 or more episodes of ulceration.
Low level laser light therapy (LLLT), with its proven tissue healing acceleration properties has recently gained attention as a simple, non-invasive alternative adjunctive therapy to assist in both wound closure and accelerated time to wound closure. Numerous histological trials have exhibited laser therapy's capacity to upregulate essential wound-healing factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), oxygen concentration, fibroblast proliferation, collagen synthesis, re-epithelialization, and tissue granulation. Clinically, the application of laser therapy has demonstrated promise, accelerating the rate of wound healing and tissue contracture.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center, and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. |
Device: Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS)
Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 mW 635 nm diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Laser Placebo Laser has the same appearance and application as the Erchonia MLS but does not emit an therapeutic output. |
Device: Placebo Laser
Placebo Laser has no therapeutic output emitted.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Difference in the Proportion of Venous Stasis Ulcers Attaining Complete Wound Closure Between Treatment Groups [Baseline and 12 Weeks]
'Complete wound closure' is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements confirmed across a consecutive two-week evaluation period. Efficacy success was defined as a statistically significant greater proportion of venous stasis ulcers in the test procedure group achieving complete wound closure compared with the proportion of venous stasis ulcers in the placebo procedure group achieving complete wound closure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in Ulcer Size [Baseline and 12 Weeks]
The study ulcer was digitally photographed, and the ulcer size/area calculated in centimeters squared (cm²) using the Aranz Medical SilhouetteMobile™ System, a portable handheld computer device with custom camera and software that enables capturing of a wound image at the point of care. The change in ulcer size from baseline to study endpoint (12 weeks) was calculated. A decrease in ulcer size indicates an improvement in the ulcer status and is positive for study success. An increase in ulcer size indicates a worsening of the ulcer status and is negative for study success.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
At least one venous stasis ulcer, diagnosed according to a differential diagnosis methodology that satisfies both criteria supportive of the ulcer's venous origin and criteria that eliminates the ulcer as being indicative of non-venous origin. Diagnostic criteria to evaluate satisfaction of criteria that is supportive of venous origin of the ulcer will involve an evaluation of medical history and wound history variables; physical examination of the affected leg and ulcer site; and objective testing
-
Resting Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) of 0.8 or greater
-
Venous Doppler ultrasound shows reflux in the suspect vein
-
Clinical Etiologic Anatomic Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification System Class 6
-
Ulcer measures 5 to 20cm², inclusive, according to standardized computerized planimetry evaluation
-
presenting venous leg ulcer has been present for 6 continuous weeks or longer
-
Subject agrees to not partake in any other form of treatment for the ulcer throughout study participation, other than the standard of care treatment provided by the investigator as part of the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Satisfaction of any exclusive diagnostic criteria that is considered indicative of an ulcer being of non-venous origin (e.g. arterial or mixed origin), or as having a non-venous component. This evaluation will include consideration of medical history and wound history variables; examination of the affected leg and ulcer site; and objective tests and measurements
-
Resting Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) of less than 0.8
-
Doppler ultrasound that shows absence of reflux in the suspect vein
-
Fasting blood glucose (blood sugar) level of greater than 140 mg/dl that is indicative of current or potential diabetes
-
Subject presents with factors that may significantly impede or delay the healing of chronic non-healing wounds, including known diabetes or other disordered glucose metabolic disease; malnutrition; collagen diseases such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; history of systematic glucocorticosteroid therapy; history of exogenous glucocorticosteroid therapy; and chemotherapeutic (antineoplastic) drug use
-
Ulcer has significant bacterial infection, confirmed by a positive swab culture utilizing Levine's technique
-
Ulcer has been present for less than 6 continuous weeks
-
Ulcer is of CEAP Class 0 through 5, inclusive
-
Ulcer measures less than 5cm² or greater than 20cm², according to standardized computerized planimetry evaluation
-
Exposed bone tendon or fascia
-
General skin disorder such as psoriasis or penicilitis
-
Immunosuppressive disorder
-
Hypercoagulable state
-
Prior deep vein thrombosis
-
Cellulites during the one-year period prior to study participation in
-
Vasculitis or collagen vascular disease
-
History of prior venous surgery
-
Any concomitant illness(es) or medical condition(s) that would render the subject inappropriate for the study (i.e., renal failure, liver disease, connective tissue disorders, etc.)
-
Active or recurrent cancer or currently receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy
-
Subject is taking a regimen of any medication(s) that may affect wound healing, including corticosteroid, chemotherapeutic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medications
-
Developmental disability/significant psychological disorder that could impair the subject's ability to provide informed consent, participate in the study protocol or record study measures, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychiatric hospitalization within the last 2 years
-
Females currently pregnant or lactating or intending to attempt to become pregnant during the course of intended study participation
-
Involvement in litigation/receiving disability benefits related to venous stasis ulcer(s).
-
Other research participation in the 30 days prior to study qualification evaluation.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jeffrey Kenkel, MD | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75390 |
2 | Luc Teot, MD | Montpellier | France |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Erchonia Corporation
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffery Kenkel, MD,
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- EC_VSU
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light-emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. | Placebo Laser has the same appearance and function as the Erchonia MLS but not does emit any therapeutic output. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 13 | 11 |
COMPLETED | 13 | 11 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center, and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. | Placebo Laser has the same appearance and application as the Erchonia MLS but does not emit an therapeutic output. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 13 | 11 | 24 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
67.92
(14.78)
|
65.80
(11.17)
|
67.00
(13.09)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
7
53.8%
|
6
54.5%
|
13
54.2%
|
Male |
6
46.2%
|
5
45.5%
|
11
45.8%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
13
100%
|
11
100%
|
24
100%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
France |
13
100%
|
11
100%
|
24
100%
|
Ulcer Size (cm²) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm²] |
10.13
(6.23)
|
11.30
(7.55)
|
10.53
(6.64)
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Degree of Ulcer Pain Rating (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
44.69
(23.93)
|
30.45
(20.04)
|
38.17
(22.93)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Difference in the Proportion of Venous Stasis Ulcers Attaining Complete Wound Closure Between Treatment Groups |
---|---|
Description | 'Complete wound closure' is defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements confirmed across a consecutive two-week evaluation period. Efficacy success was defined as a statistically significant greater proportion of venous stasis ulcers in the test procedure group achieving complete wound closure compared with the proportion of venous stasis ulcers in the placebo procedure group achieving complete wound closure. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 12 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center, and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. | Placebo Laser has the same appearance and application as the Erchonia MLS but does not emit an therapeutic output. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 11 |
Number [participants] |
3
23.1%
|
2
18.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS), Placebo Laser |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | Fisher Exact | |
Comments |
Title | Change in Ulcer Size |
---|---|
Description | The study ulcer was digitally photographed, and the ulcer size/area calculated in centimeters squared (cm²) using the Aranz Medical SilhouetteMobile™ System, a portable handheld computer device with custom camera and software that enables capturing of a wound image at the point of care. The change in ulcer size from baseline to study endpoint (12 weeks) was calculated. A decrease in ulcer size indicates an improvement in the ulcer status and is positive for study success. An increase in ulcer size indicates a worsening of the ulcer status and is negative for study success. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 12 Weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center, and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. | Placebo Laser has the same appearance and application as the Erchonia MLS but does not emit an therapeutic output. |
Measure Participants | 13 | 11 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [cm²] |
-6.26
(3.66)
|
-6.72
(5.06)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS), Placebo Laser |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | >0.05 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 13 Weeks | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser | ||
Arm/Group Description | Erchonia MLS comprises three 17.5 milliWatts (mW) 635 nanometer (nm) light emitting diodes. The center diode is fixed at 6 inches above the venous stasis ulcer center, and the other 2 diodes rotate about this center fixed diode for 20 minutes. Total dosage delivered to the skin is 2.95 J/cm squared. | Placebo Laser has the same appearance and application as the Erchonia MLS but does not emit an therapeutic output. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/13 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Erchonia ML Scanner (MLS) | Placebo Laser | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/13 (0%) | 0/11 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Clinical Consultant |
---|---|
Organization | Regulatory Insight, Inc. |
Phone | 615-712-9743 |
elvira@reginsight.com |
- EC_VSU