Reducing the Incidence of VAP in Critically Ill Children and Assessment of Oral Care With CHX

Sponsor
Istanbul Medeniyet University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04527276
Collaborator
(none)
138
1
2
12
11.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This was a single-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), in patients who were aged 1 month to 18 years, needing MV for at least 48 hours, to evaluate the effect of Chlorhexidine (CHX) on Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence and to determine VAP risk factors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Oral care with 0,12% Chlorhexidine
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients were randomized into two groups receiving CHX (0.12%) or placebo (0.9% NaCl) and followed for VAP development. All patients were consecutively randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.12% CHX rinse solution or placebo applications using a computer generated balanced randomization table. The unlabeled standardized tubes containing placebo or 0.12% CHX were serially numbered and bagged for each patient according to randomization. The preparation of bagged treatments and their numbering were done by the same personnel who was not involved in the study. The placebo rinse contained 0.9% NaCl (normal saline [NS]), and was identical to the 0.12% CHX rinse solution with regard to appearance, consistency, taste and smell. The patients, physicians, outcome assessors, and data analysts were kept blinded to the intervention.

The standard care protocols in the PICU were performed. Before beginning the study, nurses received a training program for VAP prevention, procedure/technique for oral hygiene and use of oral mucosa assessment score under supervision of pediatric residents. They were trained on the method of application of solutions according to CDC guidelines in order to ensure uniform treatments. Nurses were double blinded and had no knowledge of the solution they were using.

Both treatment groups (placebo and 0.12% CHX) received treatments at 4-hour intervals, nurses used the whole content of 5 ml tubes containing rinse solution. In both groups, nurses performed oral cleansing as follows: first, the endotracheal cuff pressure was tested to ensure proper pressure prior to oral care and oropharyngeal secretions were aspirated to remove any accumulated secretions. Then the application of rinse solutions to cleanse all areas of the oral cavity, including the anterior and posterior pharynx, gums, teeth, tongue, and buccal mucosa, with standard disposable applicator (foam swab) was applied, followed by removal of excess solution from the mouth by a sterile catheter. Strict hand hygiene was ensured during the procedures. The period of application was from the day of intubation until extubation. Presence of any adverse effect of the solutions was recorded. Beck oral assessment score (BOAS) was used twice daily to evaluate the oral health of both groups.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
138 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
All patients were consecutively randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.12% CHX rinse solution or placebo applications using a computer generated balanced randomization table.All patients were consecutively randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.12% CHX rinse solution or placebo applications using a computer generated balanced randomization table.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Care Provider)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Reducing the Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Oral Mucosal Mouthwashes With Chlorhexidine
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Chlorhexidine

5 ml of 0,12 % Chlorhexidine (CHX) solution is applied to the intervention group for oral care

Other: Oral care with 0,12% Chlorhexidine
0, 12 % CHX, and standard oral care with 0,9% NaCl were compared to assess VAP rates. Both solutions were applied to critically ill children who were intubated.

No Intervention: Placebo Group

Group of patients who received standard oral care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Prevalance of VAP [14 days]

    Prevalance of VAP /1000 ventilator days (actual number of VAP episodes)

  2. Characteristics of VAP [14 days]

    Early onset vs. late onset VAP rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Causative organisms of VAP [14 days]

    Type of micro-organisms causing VAP in both groups

  2. Duration of PICU stay [12 months]

    Median duration of PICU stay (days)

  3. Duration of Hospital stay [12 months]

    Median duration of hospital stay (days)

  4. Duration of ventilation [12 months]

    Median duration of mechanical ventilation (days)

  5. Survival [12 months]

    Rate of survival

  6. Causative organism of VAP [14 days]

    number of microorganism

  7. Causative organism [14 days]

    percentage of microorganism causing VAP

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
1 Month to 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • aged 1 month to 18 years

  • needing MV for at least 48 hours

  • PICU patients

Exclusion Criteria:
  • not consenting to participate in the study

  • known hypersensitivity to CHX

  • presence of tracheotomy,

  • undergoing MV for less than 48 hours

  • having received MV for more than 24 hours prior to PICU admission

  • readmission to PICU

  • suspected or diagnosed immunodeficiency

  • history of malignant disease(active or at remission),

  • being diagnosed with oral mucositis or periodontal disease

  • chronic pulmonary and/or cardiac diseases

  • having severe oral/facial trauma,

  • use of immunosuppressive drugs (such as corticosteroids).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Istanbul Medeniyet University Istanbul Turkey

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Istanbul Medeniyet University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Zeynep Karakaya, Principal investigator, Istanbul Medeniyet University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04527276
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IstanbulIMU
First Posted:
Aug 26, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Aug 26, 2020
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Zeynep Karakaya, Principal investigator, Istanbul Medeniyet University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 26, 2020