ZFOVA: Zero-fluoroscopic Ablation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Ablation for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Sponsor
Tongji Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03041519
Collaborator
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China (Other), Xinyang Central Hospital (Other), Ningbo No. 1 Hospital (Other), Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine (Other), Guangxi Medical University (Other)
300
1
2
86
3.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopy approach using Ensite NavX as the only imaging modality with conventional fluoroscopic approach for the catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias; conventional fluoroscopic approach use fluoroscopy plus Ensite NavX or plus Carto as the imaging modality.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation
  • Procedure: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation
N/A

Detailed Description

Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide range of heart rhythm disturbances. Fluoroscopy is a imaging modality routinely used for the ablation of arrhythmias.Due to the rising concern regarding the harmful effects of radiation exposure to both the patients and operation staffs; three-dimensional mapping systems, including CARTO and Ensite NavX, have been developed and implemented in electrophysiological procedure for the navigation of catheters inside the heart chambers. Ensite NavX system can be used for zero-fluoroscopy approach for catheter ablation of arrhythmias. This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopy approach using Ensite NavX as the only imaging modality with conventional fluoroscopic approach for the catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias; conventional fluoroscopic approach use fluoroscopy plus Ensite NavX or plus Carto as the imaging modality.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
300 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Trial to Compare the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Zero-fluoroscopic Ablation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Ablation for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias.
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2011
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2017
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation

Zero-fluoroscopy ablation will be performed under the guidance of Ensite NavX for mapping and ablation and fluoroscopy will not be used during the procedure.

Procedure: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation
Catheter ablation will be performed under the guidance of Ensite NavX and without fluoroscopy.

Active Comparator: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation

Conventional fluoroscopy ablation will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance plus Ensite NavX for mapping and ablation during the procedure.

Procedure: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation
Catheter ablation will be performed under the guidance of fluoroscopy pllus Ensite NavX.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Procedural success rates [3 months]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Total procedure time [during procedure]

  2. Fluoroscopy time [during procedure]

  3. Complications [1 year]

  4. Immediate success rate [10~30minutes]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Ventricular Tachycardia

  • Ventricular Premature Complexes

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Organic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular premature complexes

  • Drug-induced ventricular tachycardia or ventricular premature complexes

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Tongji Hospital Wuhan Hubei China 430030

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Tongji Hospital
  • Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Xinyang Central Hospital
  • Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
  • Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
  • Guangxi Medical University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yan Wang, PhD, Tongji Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Yan Wang, Professor, Tongji Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03041519
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TJHXXG-ZF-VT-20161220
First Posted:
Feb 2, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Feb 2, 2017
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Keywords provided by Yan Wang, Professor, Tongji Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 2, 2017