Physicians in Training and Critical Care Nurses Performance in Medical Code Events: Effect of Simulation-Based Training

Sponsor
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02707185
Collaborator
(none)
157
1
2
30
5.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

METHODS:
Subjects:

All internal medicine (IM), emergency medicine (EM), anesthesia (A), surgery (S) residents and all hospital ICU nurses (approximately 400 subjects) will be undergoing evaluation and training in CPR techniques according to their department training policy.

Study Assessment Tool:

An objective assessment tool has been developed and tested in medical code scenarios during training sessions recently done in the simulation lab. The tool has five domains: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Communications/Leadership, and Defibrillation. Each domain consists of 3-8 tasks and skills (attachment A).

Design:
  • Phase I: In groups of five to six subjects, residents and nurses will undergo baseline assessment in CPR techniques in the simulation lab. Subject will be presented with a clinical scenario that includes cardiopulmonary arrest. Subjects will be scored by observers based on the previously described assessment tool and will be video recorded.

  • Phase II: All study subjects who completed phase I assessment will undergo standardized debriefing and demonstration of proper CPR techniques after reviewing their individual baseline videotape followed by repeated demonstration in CPR techniques during a clinical scenario with cardiopulmonary arrest in the simulation lab. Knowledge retention will be assessed periodically.

  • Phase III: Rates of survival to hospital discharge and survival at 24 hours in hospitalized patients after cardiopulmonary arrest collected by the CPR committee and QA department longitudinally for one year after completion of project training (phase II) will be reviewed and compared to the same period one year earlier (CPR outcome data are being collected since 2005 at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospitals).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Simulation-Based Training
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
157 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Official Title:
Physicians in Training and Critical Care Nurses Performance in Medical Code Events: Effect of Simulation-Based Training
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Physicians

Physician in training: All internal medicine (IM), emergency medicine (EM), anesthesia (A), surgery (S) residents and all hospital ICU nurses.

Behavioral: Simulation-Based Training
An objective assessment tool has been developed and tested in medical code scenarios during training sessions recently done in the simulation lab. The tool has five domains: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Communications/Leadership, and Defibrillation. Each domain consists of 3-8 tasks and skills.

Other: Nurses

Nurses in Training

Behavioral: Simulation-Based Training
An objective assessment tool has been developed and tested in medical code scenarios during training sessions recently done in the simulation lab. The tool has five domains: Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Communications/Leadership, and Defibrillation. Each domain consists of 3-8 tasks and skills.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Performance scale [Baseline and 1 year]

    Change in performance scale at 1 year as compared to baseline

  2. Rates of survival [1 year]

    Rates of survival to hospital discharge after cardiopulmonary arrest one year after completion of the simulation based training in CPR

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Survey questionnaire [Baseline and 1 year]

    Change in survey questionnaire score at 1 year as compared to baseline. The questionnaire consists of 4 parts, including: adequacy of training, sense of preparedness, supervision and feedback, and general information. With the exception of the section on general information, responses are scored on a 5 point Likert scale.

  2. Perceptions of preparedness [Baseline and 1 year]

    Change in perceptions of preparedness at 1 year as compared to baseline. The method of assessment for this outcome measure is the Likert Scale

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Physicians in training and nurses
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Physicians in training and nurses refusing to have their data included in final analysis

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 St. Luke's Roosevelt Roosevelt NYC New York United States 10019

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hassan Khouli, MD, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02707185
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 10-080
  • MCT STUDY
First Posted:
Mar 14, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Mar 14, 2016
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2016
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 14, 2016