Evaluating Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Reducing Trauma-related Fractures

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT01402167
Collaborator
(none)
0
2
23

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the volume of injected ciment (polymethyl methacrylate) between a group of patients treated with vertebroplasty and a group of patients treated via kyphoplasty. Secondary evaluation will compare the restoration of vertebral height, volume and cyphotic angle between the two techniques, as well as extravation of ciment and functional and quality of life aspects related to these techniques.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Kyphoplasty
  • Procedure: Vertebroplasty
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluating Transcutaneous Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty for Reducing Trauma-related Fractures: a Randomized Pilot Study Using Catscan Volumetry
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2014
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2016
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Kyphoplasty

Patients randomized to this arm will be treated via balloon kyphoplasty.

Procedure: Kyphoplasty
Patients will be treated via a balloon kyphoplasty surgical procedure

Active Comparator: Vertebroplasty

Patients randomized to this arm will be treated via vertebroplasty.

Procedure: Vertebroplasty
Patients will be treated via a transcutaneous vertebroplasty procedure.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The volume (cm^3) of injected ciment [Baseline (Day 0)]

    The volume of injected ciment is measured by catscan extrapolated data.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Recovery of vertebral volume (%) [Day 1 to Day 7]

    Recovery of vertebral volume relative to theoretical volume based on neighboring vertebra.

  2. Change from baseline of the cyphotic angle (°) [Days 1 to 7]

    The number of degrees of change in the cyphotic angle of the corrected vertebra relative to baseline measurement (°)

  3. Change from baseline of the cyphotic angle (°) [1 month]

    The number of degrees of change in the cyphotic angle of the corrected vertebra relative to baseline measurement (°)

  4. Change from baseline of the cyphotic angle (°) [3 months]

    The number of degrees of change in the cyphotic angle of the corrected vertebra relative to baseline measurement (°)

  5. Change from baseline in vertebral height (mm) [Days 1 to 7]

    Change in vertebra height (mm) before and after surgery

  6. Change from baseline in vertebral height (mm) [1 month]

    Change in vertebra height (mm) before and after surgery

  7. Change from baseline in vertebral height (mm) [3 months]

    Change in vertebra height (mm) before and after surgery

  8. Volume of ciment leakage (cm^3) [Day 1]

    The volume of ciment leakage will be determined according to catscan data.

  9. Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [Day 0 (post-op)]

    Brute change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  10. Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [1 month]

    Brute change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  11. Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [3 months]

    Brute change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  12. % Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [Day 0 (post-op)]

    The percentage change (%) in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  13. % Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [1 month]

    The percentage change (%) in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  14. % Change in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery [3 months]

    The percentage change (%) in Visual Analog Scale (0 to 10) for pain before and after surgery

  15. The change in the ODI score before and after surgery [3 months]

    The change in the Oswestry Disability Index before and after surgery

  16. The % change in the ODI score before and after surgery [3 months]

    The percentage change (%) in the Oswestry Disability Index before and after surgery

  17. Change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery

  18. Change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery

  19. The % change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Percentage change (%) in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery

  20. The % change in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Percentage change (%) in SF-36 quality of life score before and after surgery

  21. Change in FABQ score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Change in the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  22. Change in FABQ score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Change in the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  23. % Change in FABQ score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Percentage change (%) in the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  24. % Change in FABQ score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Percentage change (%) in the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  25. Change in DPQ score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Change in the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  26. Change in DPQ score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Change in the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  27. % Change in DPQ score before and after surgery [3 months]

    Percentage change (%) in the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  28. % Change in DPQ score before and after surgery [1 month]

    Percentage change (%) in the Dallas Pain Questionnaire score before and after surgery

  29. Duration of surgery (minutes) [Day 0 (day of surgery)]

    Length of operative time (minutes)

  30. Presence / absence of per-operative complications [Day 0 (day of surgery)]

    Presence / absence of per-operative complications

  31. Presence / absence of post-operative complications [1 month]

    Presence / absence of post-operative complications

  32. Presence / absence of post-operative complications [3 months]

    Presence / absence of post-operative complications

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
50 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent

  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

  • The patient is available for 3 months of follow-up

  • Fracture type according to Magerl Classification (1994) must be one of the following: A1, A2.1, A3.1, A3.2

  • Cyphose of >10°

  • Spinal pain

  • Vertebral fracture < 3 weeks old located between D5 and L5

  • If fragments in the canal, they must protrude less than 40%

  • Absence of other lesions, including cancer

Exclusion Criteria:
  • The patient is participating in another study

  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study

  • The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship

  • The patient refuses to sign the consent

  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient

  • Patient cannot read French

  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding

  • Patient has a fracture on an adjacent vertebra

  • Patient has a contra-indication for a treatment used in this study

  • ASA class IV or V

  • Patient has a neurological deficit

  • Previous spinal surgery

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pascal Kouyoumdjian, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01402167
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • LOCAL/2011/PK-04
First Posted:
Jul 26, 2011
Last Update Posted:
Mar 25, 2015
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2015
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 25, 2015