VS-WEB: Virtual Simulation for Woven EndoBridge Device Sizing

Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04621552
Collaborator
University Hospital, Bordeaux (Other)
186
1
69.9
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Selection of the appropriate size of the device is mandatory during aneurysm treatment with a WEB. The Investigators aimed to investigate if virtual simulation with Sim&Size software may have an impact on technical, angiographic, and clinical outcomes after WEB treatment. Data from two large-volume centers were collected and compared (January 2017-January 2020). Virtual simulation was systematically adopted in one center, while conventional sizing was used in the other one. Outcomes were the duration of intervention, the radiation dose (mGy), the number of corrective interventions for inappropriate WEB size, the number of WEBs not deployed, angiographic occlusion, and complications. Univariate and multivariate linear models were adopted.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: WEB embolization

Detailed Description

Flow disruption with Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is an innovative treatment that has been evaluated in several prospective and retrospective studies1-3. The efficacy and safety of this strategy has been largely proved, and nowadays, indications for WEBs are progressively enlarged. Appropriate sizing of the device is the key factor for treatment with a WEB. Undersized devices may lead to insufficient coverage of the aneurysm neck and inadequate filling of the volume of the sac, lowering the angiographic success. On the other hand, an excessively oversized WEB may cause an unwarranted protrusion into the parent vessel, increasing the risk of ischemic events. The conventional approach for WEB sizing is based on two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (2D-DSA), adding 1mm to the average width (to assure good wall apposition), and subtracting 1mm to the average height of the aneurysm (to adjust for the longitudinal increase caused by the horizontal compression)4. However, the operator has to anticipate the behavior of the device, predicting tridimensional modifications of the WEB in relation to the volume and shape of the aneurysm dome and neck. Accordingly, appropriate WEB sizing could be difficult and may require experience. Data about software-based simulation to predict changes after device implantation have been reported for flow diversion and braided stents5-7. The Sim&Size software (Sim&Cure, Grabels, France) is able to perform virtual sizing before WEB deployment using pre or per-operative three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) acquisition. The virtual simulation helps to select the most appropriate size of the device, predicting the behavior of the WEB inside the aneurysm dome, and the surface of the WEB apposition, anticipating protrusion over the neck or inappropriate coverage of the ostium. This multicenter study aimed to explore if the use of the Sim&Size software during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms with WEB devices was associated with measurables procedural advantages compared with conventional sizing methods.

The primary investigated outcomes were 1) the median duration of the intervention; 2) the median radiation dose; 3) the need of corrective interventions; and 4) the number of WEBs opened but finally not deployed because of the inappropriate size of the device.

The secondary investigated endpoints were 1) the overall rate of complications (peri-procedural and long-term adverse events); 2) the morbidity rate (complications associated with permanent change of the clinical and neurological status of the patient); and 3) short-term (6 months) and long-term (12 months or more) aneurysm occlusion and WEB-shape change ("compaction") (decrease in height of the device or a deepening of the proximal and distal concave recesses during follow-up9 based on non-subtracted images)

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
186 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Woven EndoBridge Device Sizing With Conventional Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: A Multi-Center Experience
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 30, 2020

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Median duration of the intervention [1day]

    the median duration of the intervention

  2. Median radiation dose [1 day]

    the median radiation dose

  3. Need of corrective interventions [1 day]

    the need of corrective interventions

  4. number of WEBs opened [1 day]

    the number of WEBs opened but finally not deployed because of the inappropriate size of the device.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall rate of complications [1 day]

    the overall rate of complications (peri-procedural and long-term adverse events)

  2. morbidity rate [1 day]

    the morbidity rate (complications associated with permanent change of the clinical and neurological status of the patient)

  3. Rate of Aneurysm occlusion [6 months and 12 months]

    short-term (6 months) and long-term (12 months or more) aneurysm occlusion

  4. WEB-shape change [6 months and 12 months]

    WEB-shape change ("compaction") (decrease in height of the device or a deepening of the proximal and distal concave recesses during follow-up9 based on non-subtracted images).

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion criteria:
  • Patients > 18 years treated with WEB for intracranial aneuryms
Exclusion criteria:
  • Patients <18 years

  • no eligibility for treatment with WEB

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Uhmontpellier Montpellier France 34295

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Montpellier
  • University Hospital, Bordeaux

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Federico Cagnazzo, MD PhD, UH Montpellier

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Montpellier
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04621552
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RECHMPL20_0601
First Posted:
Nov 9, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Nov 10, 2020
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Montpellier
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 10, 2020