Viewing Strategy Training
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Viewing strategies are strategies used to process visual Information. Many children with visual impairment seem to lack systematic viewing strategies. However, it is unknown how viewing strategies differ between children with normal vision and children with (cerebral) visual impairment. In addition, viewing strategy training is often adopted in clinical practice, but till date there is no scientific evidence about effectiveness of this approach.
The current project has two goals: (1) to measure viewing strategies used by children with normal vision, children with ocular visual impairment and children with CVI, and (2) to evaluate whether training viewing strategies results in more efficiƫnt visual Information processing.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group A) early training group T0 = baseline measurement T1 = posttest (within two weeks after training) T2 = follow up measurement (6 months after training) |
Behavioral: Viewing strategy training
Children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol-based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.
|
Experimental: Group B) late training group T0 = baseline measurement T1 = test-retest reliability and natural development (over period 1 1/2-2 months after T0) T2 = posttest (within two weeks after training) |
Behavioral: Viewing strategy training
Children receive a visual training of viewing strategies (six weeks, 2 times a week, 30 minutes). During the training, children are instructed to use specific viewing strategies (looking in a structured direction which fits the task at hand, zooming in and out / change of visual selective attentional field, visual discrimination). The verbal instructions and exercises are protocol-based. A textbook is used to describe the reactions of the children during training.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Changes in reading accuracy after viewing strategy training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Radner reading test
- Changes in reading speed after viewing strategy training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Radner reading test
- Changes in visual search accuracy after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Accuracy during conjunction search
- Changes in visual search speed after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Speed during conjunction search
- Changes in saccade amplitudes during reading and visual search after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Saccade amplitudes measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
- Changes in fixation duration during reading and search after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Fixation durations measured using Radner reading test and conjunction search
- Changes in average distance between fixation points during conjunction search (EB-VSA) after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Average distance between fixation points using Radner reading test and conjunction search
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Changes in WISC-V visual processing speed index (VSI) after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
WISC-IV visual processing speed index
- Changes in local visual selective attention after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
TEA-Ch Speurtocht (total number of symbols found in 1 minute)
- Changes in global visual selective attention after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
Gestalt Closure (Kaufman-ABC), number of correct answers
- Changes in visual identification speed after training [Group A: Day 0, Month 2, Month 8; Group B: Day 0, Month 2, Month 4]
'DST-Plaatjes Benoemen', number of pictures correctly named within 1 minute
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria typically developing children with normal vision:
-
Age 5-12 years
-
linear distant visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better
-
Verbal IQ above 70
-
Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D
Inclusion criteria for children with ocular visual impairment:
-
Age 5-12 years
-
Children with linear distance visual acuity better <=1.3logMAR and >0.1 logMAR
-
Intact central visual field (at least > 30 degrees)
-
Children with a verbal IQ above 70
-
Absence of developmental disorders or psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D
Inclusion criteria for children with cerebral visual impairment:
-
Age 5-12 years
-
Linear distance visual acuity <=0.3 logMAR
-
Having the diagnosis CVI (verified by ophthalmologists)
-
Children with a verbal IQ above 70
-
Absence of psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D
Additional inclusion criterion for study 2 (evaluating training effectiveness): children with (cerebral) visual impairment should have an indication for viewing strategy training. Training should not be indicated if children have no problems performing academic tasks (i.e. when speed and accuracy of visual processing is within the normal range). The age range for study 2 is 5-9 years.
Exclusion criteria:
-
Children with VI: linear near visual acuity >1.0 logMAR
-
Children with visual field defect < 30 degrees
-
Children with a verbal IQ below 70
-
Children who attended a form of vision training in the past two years
-
Children with psychiatric problems like ASS or AD(H)D
-
Auditory impairment or language impairments
-
Major life events during training
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Royal Dutch Visio
- Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bianca Huurneman, PhD, Royal Dutch Visio
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- NL81584.091.22