LOVIT: VA Low Vision Intervention Trial

Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00223756
Collaborator
(none)
61
1
2
33
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new outpatient low vision rehabilitation program that is targeted to serve legally blind veterans with central vision loss. The hypothesis is that veterans in the treatment group will self-report less difficulty performing daily activities than veterans in the control group who are on a waiting list for VA low vision or blind rehabilitation programs.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Low Vision Intervention - Outpatient Training Program
N/A

Detailed Description

Abstract: Research Question:

Estimates are that there will be 854,000 severely visually impaired veterans in the year 2005 and 890,000 in the year 2010. Statistics, based upon the 2000 census, suggest that it will be well into the next decade before the number of severely visually impaired veterans begins to decrease. Waiting time for admission to VA blind rehabilitation centers (BRCs) is often a year or more. Low vision services are an important aspect of blind rehabilitation, as 85% of veterans admitted to BRCs have useful remaining vision. In the private sector, low vision services are provided in outpatient settings. Yet, legally blind veterans are still encouraged, if not required, to attend regional inpatient programs to obtain therapy with low vision devices because a reimbursement model is not available for outpatient blind rehabilitation and few low vision outpatient clinics have rehabilitation professionals to provide this training. The VA system needs alternative service delivery options for veterans who are unable to participate in inpatient rehabilitation. Outpatient low vision programs should provide continuity of care with the regional BRC programs and insure local access to low vision care that is high quality, timely, and cost-effective. Currently, the VERA Reimbursement Model allocates $27,826 per blind rehabilitation admission. Outpatient low vision programs have the potential to substitute for inpatient low vision services and more costly inpatient rehabilitation programs may not be necessary for higher functioning veterans. The purpose of the proposed research is to measure the effectiveness of a low vision outpatient program for legally blind veterans with central vision loss from macular diseases that could be provided at local VA facilities.

Specific Objectives are to:
  1. Compare the mean change in self-report of difficulty performing daily activities measured with the Veteran's Affairs Low Vision Visual Function Questionnaire - 48 (VA LV VFQ-48) reading domain scores from baseline to 4 months after randomization [two months after veterans participate in a low vision outpatient program or usual care (waiting list) control group].

  2. Determine if the mean change in VA LV VFQ-48 composite and reading domain scores from baseline to 4 months after randomization [two months after veterans participate in a low vision outpatient program or usual care (waiting list) control group] can be predicted by baseline measures of visual impairment, functional status and life state or explained by measures of functional status after rehabilitation.

  3. Perform an economic evaluation of costs and cost-effectiveness of the low vision outpatient program.

  4. Compare the mean change in VA LV VFQ-48 scores from the clinical trial from baseline to 4 months after randomization (two months after veterans participate in a low vision outpatient program) to historical data on the mean change in VA LV VFQ-48 scores from the Hines BRC program.

Hypothesis: Compared to the usual care (waiting list) control group, veterans in the treatment group will self-report a reduction of .78 logits or more in difficulty performing daily living activities measured by the VA LV VFQ-48 reading domain scores from baseline to 4 months after randomization (two months after veterans participate in a low vision outpatient program).The .78 logit change is clinically significant, as this improvement corresponds to the change in visual ability that would accompany a 6-line improvement on an EDTRS visual acuity chart.

Significance: The NIH includes visual impairment, chronic visual deficiencies that impair everyday function that are not correctable by ordinary glasses, among the 10 most prevalent causes of disability in America. Persons confronted with vision loss often feel limited and frustrated performing everyday activities such as reading, traveling from place to place, and recognizing objects or people. As a result, they may experience loss of self esteem, social isolation, difficulty working and reduced independence. The low vision team evaluates the level of remaining vision, prescribes special lenses or devices and techniques for using remaining vision more effectively. Low vision rehabilitation restores independence by enabling persons with vision loss to perform daily living tasks independently at home, at work or within the community.

Research Design: the proposed study is a randomized clinical trial conducted at two sites. Subjects are 122 legally blind veterans from Hines Hospital and Heffner VAMC. Veterans will be randomized to treatment from a new low vision outpatient program or a usual care (waiting list) control group. Following a low vision examination, veterans in the treatment group will receive 5 (2-2 1/2 hour) therapy sessions at the local VA sites and one home visit to evaluate the home environment and set up prescribed devices. The primary outcome measure is change in reading domain scores on the VA LV VFQ-48, a telephone questionnaire where subjects self-report their difficulty performing daily living activities in the community. Other measures include, instructors rating of veteran's visual skills and use of low vision devices after rehabilitation, visual skills for reading (PEPPER VSRT), health status (SF-36), and symptoms of depression (CES-D). Outcomes will be compared with T tests. Multiple linear regression models will be used to identify predictors and explain outcomes. Costs and cost effectiveness of outpatient treatment compared to treatment in an inpatient BRC will be evaluated.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
61 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
VA Low Vision Intervention Trial
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2006
Actual Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2007

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1

interdisciplinary, outpatient blind rehabilitation

Other: Low Vision Intervention - Outpatient Training Program
Patients receive LV therapy as outpatients
Other Names:
  • Therapy Group
  • No Intervention: Arm 2

    usual care

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. VA LV VFQ-48 Reading Domain Scores [4 months from baseline]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Primary eye diagnosis (in better seeing eye) of either macular degeneration, macular dystrophy, macular hole or inflammatory disease of the macula

    2. Habitual visual acuity (in better seeing eye) better than 20/500 but less than 20/100

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. does not have a phone

    2. does not speak English

    3. has previously received low vision services as part of an inpatient blind rehabilitation program

    4. has participated in a low vision program that provided low vision devices to meet reading needs with low vision therapy administered by an occupational therapist or vision rehabilitation professional since most recent significant decrease in vision

    5. has English literacy less than 5th grade level

    6. has habitual visual acuity in better seeing eye of equal to or better than 20/100, less than or equal to 20/500

    7. fails Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) screening (score of 30 or lower)

    8. has history of stroke with aphasia

    9. has other health condition that would preclude follow-up (e.g. significant malignancy or life-threatening disease)

    10. is unable or unwilling to attend clinic visits required for the study

    11. has severe hearing impairment that interferes with participation in telephone questionnaires

    12. reports significant loss of vision since last eye exam

    13. has vitreous hemorrhage, serous or hemorrhagic detachment of the macula, clinically significant macular edema or cystoid macular edema that is likely to result in further loss or improvement in vision after treatment in better seeing eye

    14. plans cataract extraction in the next 6 months.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Hines Illinois United States 60141-5000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • VA Office of Research and Development

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Joan Stelmack, OD MPH, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    VA Office of Research and Development
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00223756
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • C3457-R
    First Posted:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 8, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Keywords provided by VA Office of Research and Development
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jan 8, 2016