The Effect of Retrobulbar Block for Eye Surgery on Brain Oxygenation and Cognitive Functions in Elderly Patients

Sponsor
Cengiz KAYA (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03189329
Collaborator
Ondokuz Mayıs University (Other)
66
1
2
12
5.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators measured changes in cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) and MMSE scores after retrobulbar block performed with levobupivacaine and lidocaine in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery.A total of 66 patients over the age of 60 undergoing vitreoretinal surgery with a total duration of less than 1 hour were included in this prospective, double-blinded study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group L (5ml, 2% lidocaine) and group LB (5ml, 0.5% levobupivacaine). Bilateral rSO2 measurements were recorded before the retrobulbar block and at 1-5 minutes post-block, during the procedure, and at 10-40 minutes post-op. MMSE was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in order to evaluate short term cognitive function. Sensory and motor block durations, pain, akinesia and conjunctival feeling scores, patient-surgeon satisfaction, and complications were also recorded.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride
  • Drug: 0.5% levobupivacaine
Phase 4

Detailed Description

A total of 66 patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery (total duration < 60 minutes) using retrobulbar block, who were classified as category I-III according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Classification system, who were over the age of 60, and who had no cognitive dysfunction were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: contraindication for retrobulbar block, preoperative systolic blood pressure of 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure of above 100 mmHg, uncontrolled diabetes, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, MMSE ≤ 24, advanced organ failure, or Hb < 9gr/dl.The patients were randomly divided into two groups using a sealed-envelope method:

Group L: Patients undergoing block with lidocaine (n = 33) Group LB: Patients undergoing block with levobupivacaine (n = 33) The patients did not undergo premedication in order to accommodate the postoperative MMSE evaluation. For intra-operative sedation, remifentanil (UltivaR, GlaxoSmithKline, Berntford, UK) was initiated as an infusion at a dose range of 0.05-0.1 mcg/kg/min. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate values were allowed to vary up to 20% of the preoperative values of the patients. For this purpose, the remifentanil infusion rate was increased or decreased at the determined dose interval.

Retrobulbar block was performed with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (AritmalR, Osel, Istanbul, Turkey) in Group L patients and 5ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine (ChirocaineR, Abbvie, Chicago, USA) in Group LB patients. The block was performed by the same practitioner (fourth year assistant of Ophthalmology Department) using inferotemporal approach as described by Sanderson using 27 gage disposable needles (Atkinson Retrobulbar NeedleR, Asico, USA).

Sensory and motor block onset and end times and akinesia score were recorded. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded in the preoperative period, at minutes 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 intra-operatively, and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes postoperatively in the recovery room.

. The patients were transferred to the operating table for measurement of bilateral rSO2, and preoxygenation was performed for three minutes using 4 L/min 100% oxygen via nasal cannula. The basal oxygenation values were determined by taking the average of the last 30 s measurements. The rSO2 values were recorded at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30th, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 minutes after retrobulbar block, and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes after the completion of the procedure.

Cognitive functions were assessed by the same technician using MMSE in the preoperative period, 40 minutes postoperatively and at 7 days after the operation (short term).Surgeon satisfaction was queried at the end of the case and patient satisfaction was questioned at the end of day.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
66 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
The Effect of Retrobulbar Block on Bi-Hemispheric Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Early Period Postoperative Cognitive Functions With Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine in Elderly Patients With Ophthalmic Surgery
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group L

Patients undergoing block with 2% lidocaine hydrochloride

Drug: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride
Retrobulbar block was performed with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (AritmalR, Osel, Istanbul, Turkey) in Group L patients. The block was performed by the same practitioner (fourth year assistant of Ophthalmology Department) using inferotemporal approach as described by Sanderson using 27 gage disposable needles (Atkinson Retrobulbar NeedleR, Asico, USA)

Active Comparator: Group LB

Patients undergoing block with 0.5% levobupivacaine

Drug: 0.5% levobupivacaine
and 5ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine (ChirocaineR, Abbvie, Chicago, USA) in Group LB patients. The block was performed by the same practitioner (fourth year assistant of Ophthalmology Department) using inferotemporal approach as described by Sanderson using 27 gage disposable needles (Atkinson Retrobulbar NeedleR, Asico, USA)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Cerebral oxygen saturation changes (rSO2) [The rSO2 value changes were recorded from baseline up to 40 minutes after surgery]

    The NIRS device probes (INVOS-3100AR; Somanetics Inc., Troy, MI, USA) were placed at least 2 cm above the eyebrows and 3 cm away from the mid-line of the forehead, on right and left, in accordance with the instructions of manufacturer.The patient's forehead was cleaned with acetone alcohol before the sensor pads were glued, and wrapped with a bandage so that the sensors were not affected by ambient light. The patients were transferred to the operating table for measurement of bilateral rSO2, and preoxygenation was performed for three minutes using 4 L/min 100% oxygen via nasal cannula.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Cognitive function measurement [Cognitive functions were assessed from baseline up to 7 days after the surgery]

    Cognitive functions were assessed by the same technician using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test.

  2. Sensory block onset time by the conjunctival feeling score using the cotton contact test. [The sensory block onset time was recorded at the beginning of surgery till the first 15 min]

    The sensory block onset time was recorded as the moment when the patient did not feel a piece of cotton touching the cornea. This time was measured by the conjunctival feeling score using the cotton contact test (0: normal, 1: less sensitive, 2: complete sensory loss). Score of 2 on the scale was considered as onset time for sensory block.

  3. Sensory block end time by the conjunctival feeling score using the cotton contact test. [The sensory block end time was recorded at the end of surgery till the first 24 h]

    The time at which recovery of sensory block was recovered was measured by the conjunctival feeling score using the cotton contact test (0: normal, 1: less sensitive, 2: complete sensory loss). Score of 0 on the scale was considered as end time for sensory block.

  4. Motor block onset time by eye movements score. [The motor block onset time was recorded at the beginning of surgery till the first 15 min]

    The motor block onset time was recorded as the time that the patient's eye movements score was four or less. Eye movements score was measured over three points in each of the four quadrants as follows: 3, full eye movement and 0, no movement.

  5. Motor block end time by eye movements score. [The motor block end time was recorded at the end of surgery till the first 24 h]

    The time at which recovery of motor block was recovered was measured by the eye movements score (three points in each of the four quadrants as follows: 3, full eye movement and 0, no movement). Score of 12 on the scale was considered as end time for motor block.

  6. The akinesia score measurement [The akinesia score was assessed at the beginning of surgery till the first 15 min.]

    The akinesia score was assessed between 0-12 points after 10 minutes of block application. Eye movements were measured over three points in each of the four quadrants as follows: 3, full eye movement and 0, no movement. The sum of the movement scores across all four quadrants was recorded as the akinesian score. An eye with full movement was scored as 12, and an immobile eye was scored as 0. If the akinesia score was four or less, the block was considered successful.

  7. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurement [The mean arterial pressure was recorded from baseline up to 40 minutes after surgery]

    The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded in the preoperative period, at minutes 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 intra-operatively, and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes postoperatively in the recovery room.

  8. The heart rate (HR) measurement [The heart rate (HR) was recorded from baseline up to 40 minutes after surgery]

    The heart rate (HR) was recorded in the preoperative period, at minutes 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 intra-operatively, and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes postoperatively in the recovery room.

  9. The oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurement [The oxygen saturation (SpO2) was recorded from baseline up to 40 minutes after surgery]

    The oxygen saturation (SpO2) was recorded in the preoperative period, at minutes 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, and 60 intra-operatively, and at 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes postoperatively in the recovery room.

  10. Surgeon satisfaction [Surgeon satisfaction was queried at the end of the surgery till the first 15 min.]

    They were asked to score over 10 point scale. Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated using 10 point scale ( 0 = not satisfied at all and 10 = very satisfied)

  11. Patient satisfaction [Patient satisfaction was questioned 24 hours after surgery]

    They were asked to score over 10 point scale. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using 10 point scale ( 0 = not satisfied at all and 10 = very satisfied)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Undergoing vitreoretinal surgery (total duration < 60 minutes)

  • The ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Classification I-III

  • Over the age of 60

  • The patiens who had no cognitive dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Contraindication for retrobulbar block

  • Preoperative systolic blood pressure of 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure of above 100 mmHg

  • Uncontrolled diabetes

  • Body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2

  • MMSE ≤ 24

  • Advanced organ failure

  • Hb < 9gr/dl

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Samsun Atakum Turkey 55139

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Cengiz KAYA
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cengiz Kaya, MD, Ondokuz Mayıs University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Cengiz KAYA, Associate Professor, MD, Ondokuz Mayıs University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03189329
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PYO.TIP.1904.15.009
First Posted:
Jun 16, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Jun 16, 2017
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Cengiz KAYA, Associate Professor, MD, Ondokuz Mayıs University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 16, 2017