Hyoscine Butyl-bromide Versus Ondansetron for Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia

Sponsor
Assiut University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04785118
Collaborator
(none)
165
1
3
10
16.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

overall incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting(IONV) during regional anesthesia for cesarean section is extremely variable, up to 80 percent , depending on the anesthetic technique used (spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural) and on the preventive and therapeutic measures taken.1 Spinal anesthesia for CS is safe and effective; it is currently the anesthetic technique of choice for elective Cesarean delivery (CD). However, maternal hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia is one of the primary causes of intraoperative nausea and/or vomiting (IONV); this symptom is thought to be caused by cerebral and gut hypoperfusion that stimulate the vomiting centre in the brainstem and cause serotonin release, respectively.2, 3 While bolus dosing of phenylephrine effectively treats maternal hypotension, it does not prevent intraoperative maternal nausea, which may be associated with established hypotension, and this may adversely affect patient satisfaction.4, 5 However, the unopposed vagal activity that occurs with sympathetic block might be another cause of intraoperative nausea and vomiting during spinal anesthesia.6

Both scopolamine and atropine are tertiary amines, which cross the blood-brain barrier with central side effects, such as confusion, sedation, or paradoxical excitation. However, Hyoscine butyl bromide (HBB) has a quaternary ammonium structure that does not cross through the blood-brain barrier and also with lower placental transfer than atropine, making it more suitable for use in pregnancy 7, 8.

Hyoscine Butyl-bromide, also known as scopolamine butyl-bromide and sold under the brand name Buscopan.9 Despite being a quaternary ammonium compound, HBB is still capable of targeting the chemoreceptor trigger zone due to the lack of a well-developed blood-brain-barrier in the medulla oblongata, which potentiates the antiemetic effects that it produces through local action on the smooth muscle of the gastrointestinal tract.10

So, the aim of the current study is to examine the effect of prophylactic use of HBB and Ondansetron to decrease the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia and thus intraoperative nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing CD under spinal anaesthesia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
165 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Hyoscine Butyl-bromide Versus Ondansetron for Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: buscopan

Patients will receive IV hyoscine butyl-bromide 20 mg in 2 ml, just before spinal anaesthesia.

Drug: Hyoscine N Butylbromide
Patients will receive IV hyoscine butyl-bromide 20 mg in 2 ml, just before spinal anaesthesia.

Active Comparator: ondansetron

Patients will receive IV ondansetron 4 mg in 2 ml, just before spinal anaesthesia.

Drug: Ondansetron
Patients received IV ondansetron 4 mg in 2 ml, just before spinal anaesthesia.

Placebo Comparator: control

Patients will receive 2 ml of IV normal saline as a placebo just before spinal anaesthesia.

Drug: Saline
Patients received 2 ml of IV normal saline as a placebo just before spinal anaesthesia.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. intraoperative nausea and vomiting [intraoperative]

    the incidence of intraoperative all emesis

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All patients 18-40 years of age,

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification class I and II

  • patients scheduled for elective or semi-elective surgery (category 3 and 4 Caesarean section) under spinal anaesthesia

  • Single baby pregnancy of more than 32 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:
  • height < 150 or > 180 cm,

  • Body mass index (BMI) >35 kg m-2,

  • Contraindication or refusal to undergo regional anaesthesia,

  • any cardiovascular disease including arrhythmias, Patients on β-adrenergic blockers or any drugs that may alter the normal response to the study drug,

  • history of PONV or motion sickness,

  • had taken antiemetic medication in the previous week,

  • had a history of hyperemesis gravidarum

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Assiut University hospital Assiut Egypt 11111

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Assiut University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Mostafa Samy Abbas, associate professor of anesthesia, Assiut University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04785118
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Hyoscine vs Ondansetrone
First Posted:
Mar 5, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Oct 6, 2021
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 6, 2021