A Comparison Between Lumen-apposing Metal Stent and Double-pigtail Plastic Stents for Treatment of Walled-off Necrosis

Sponsor
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04876235
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
8
6.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of solid and liquid necrotic material that is usually formed 4 weeks after an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. As the advances in endoscopic techniques and accessories, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a double mushroom head metal stent and a double pigtail plastic stent in the treatment of encapsulated necrosis of the pancreas.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: endoscopic ultrasound
  • Device: lumen-apposing metal stent
  • Device: double-pigtail plastic stents
N/A

Detailed Description

According to the revised Atlanta classification, pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) include acute peripancreatic fluid collections(APFCs) and acute necrotic collections(ANCs), which, over time, turn into pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Drainage of these PP and WON is required when they increase in size and become infected or become symptomatic.

Traditionally, WON has been managed surgically, however, surgical necrosectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when pursued early. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON).

Double-pigtail plastic stents(DPPS) is the earliest stent used for WON drainage in ultrasound endoscopy, however, These stents are limited by their small diameter leading to increased risk of stent obstruction. Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been increasingly used because of the advantage of better lumen apposition and wider diameter, improving access for endoscopic debridement. However, more adverse events(AEs) such as bleeding have been reported.

This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS in the treatment of Walled-off necrosis

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy and Safety of Double-pigtail Plastic Versus Lumen-apposing Metal Stents for Transmural Drainage of Walled-off Necrosis
Actual Study Start Date :
May 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: LAMS group

place LAMS under endoscopic ultrasound. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy(DEN) was performed through the LAMS with a forward viewing gastroscope if necessary

Procedure: endoscopic ultrasound
All patients were implanted with stents(DPPS or LAMS)under the EUS

Device: lumen-apposing metal stent
In the LAMS group, patients were stented with LAMS

Active Comparator: DPPS group

Place DPPS under endoscopic ultrasound. When required, DEN was performed once the cystogastrostomy/duodenostomy tract had matured. This was done by first removing the stents followed by dilation of the tract with a radial expansion balloon and insertion of a forward viewing gastroscope through the tract for DEN

Procedure: endoscopic ultrasound
All patients were implanted with stents(DPPS or LAMS)under the EUS

Device: double-pigtail plastic stents
In the DPPS group, patients were stented with DPPS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. clinical success (clinical improvement and resolution of WON) [two months]

    compare rates of WON resolution in patients with LAMS and DPPS for treatment of walled-off necrosis

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Adverse Events [two months]

    Number of participants with adverse events; type, frequency and intensity of adverse events

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Obtention of a written informed consent

  • According to Revised Atlanta Classification, abdominal CT/MRI and EUS were diagnosed as WON

  • The diameter of WON ≥6cm

  • Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire

  • The distance between the EUS-probe and WON was < 1 cm.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • No written informed consent

  • pancreatic cystic tumor, pancreatic cancer and other benign and malignant tumors

  • pancreatic pseudocyst

  • WON too far from the stomach and duodenum to perform endoscopic drainage

  • Serious abnormalities in liver and kidney function and coagulation function

  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Jianfeng Yang Hangzhou Zhejiang China 310006

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Investigators

  • Study Director: Xiaofeng Zhang, M.S, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jianfeng Yang, Deputy irector, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04876235
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2021-03-221
First Posted:
May 6, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Aug 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jianfeng Yang, Deputy irector, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 30, 2021