wePRO-CASA: Wearable and Patient-reported Outcome-based Continuous Assessment and Support Alerts in Palliative Care
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This research explores the use of wearable sensors (WS) and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys as tools to describe activity patterns and stress levels of advanced cancer patient/caregiver dyads in order to understand their needs better.
Physiological data will be recorded passively during wearable sensors wear times. Electronic patient-reported outcome surveys will be used to perform ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) triggered by WS signals. If this pilot finds ecological momentary assessments useful, feasible and scalable, a long-term aim for follow-on studies is to translate EMA-based interventions into routine care.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Non-professional carers (typically family members) play a critical in providing adequate home care along with professional caregivers. However, the physical and emotional toll of caring for a family member can lead to distress and burn out of the carer. The latter often results in the need for temporary or permanent institutional care of the patient. There is an interrelationship between patients' depressive symptoms and carers' anxiety and likely other forms of distress. This research explores the use of wearable sensors and electronic patient-reported outcome surveys as tools to describe activity patterns and stress levels of advanced cancer patient/caregiver dyads in order to understand their needs better.
Physiological data will be recorded passively during WS wear times. Electronic patient-reported outcome surveys will be used to perform ecological momentary assessments triggered by wearable sensors signals. If this pilot finds ecological momentary assessments useful, feasible and scalable, a long-term aim for follow-on studies is to translate EMA-based interventions into routine care. This may comprise conventional support strategies informed by needs discovered through ecological momentary assessments during the pilot project, or if deemed feasible, ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) that use EMAs beyond the pilot to trigger just-in-time targeted interventions
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Patients Eligible patients will be identified by the Nurse Practitioner Cancer & Palliative Care. |
Device: Garmin VivoSmart 4
Wearable sensor to record; sleep, stress, heart rate etc.
Device: mema - ilumivu
mEMA is the a self-service platform running on both iOS and Android that is specifically designed for the administration of mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment or Experience Sampling research studies.
|
Carers The respective carers who are identified by the Nurse Practitioner Cancer & Palliative Care as eligible participants. |
Device: Garmin VivoSmart 4
Wearable sensor to record; sleep, stress, heart rate etc.
Device: mema - ilumivu
mEMA is the a self-service platform running on both iOS and Android that is specifically designed for the administration of mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment or Experience Sampling research studies.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Wearable compliance [5 weeks]
Wearable compliance (compliance defined HR signal detected for >=70% of daytime hours between 7:30am to 7:30 pm)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Correlative analysis of WS signals and ePRO's [5 weeks]
Correlative analysis of WS signals and ePRO answers with focus on: Intra-dyadic longitudinal trends (Is there correlation between metrics of a patient and their carer?) EMA trigger incidences and distribution of ePRO-stated trigger reasons including "false alarms" of the whole cohort
- Qualitative exploration of EMAs/EMIs in focus group [2 hours]
Qualitative exploration of EMAs/EMIs in focus group regarding: Acceptability by patient/carer dyads Scalability into routine care Perception of potential clinical utility by clinicians
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Palliative care patient attending at Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, RNSH
-
Patient and carer dyad
-
Both patient and carer consent
-
Patient Karnofsky Performance Scale ≥ 50
-
Patient and carer have compatible smart phone
Exclusion Criteria:
• Unwilling or unable to give informed consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Royal North Shore Hospital | St Leonards | New South Wales | Australia | 2067 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Royal North Shore Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thilo Schuler, Royal North Shore Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Berry LL, Dalwadi SM, Jacobson JO. Supporting the Supporters: What Family Caregivers Need to Care for a Loved One With Cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jan;13(1):35-41. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.017913. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Review.
- Bolzani A, Ramsenthaler C, Hodiamont F, Burner-Fritsch IS, Bausewein C. Monitoring of Palliative Care Symptoms and Concerns in Specialized Palliative Home Care Using an Electronic Version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (Palli-MONITOR): protocol for a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 1;11(6):e042266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042266.
- Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G, Asada Y, McIntyre PF, Flowerdew G. Preferred and Actual Location of Death: What Factors Enable a Preferred Home Death? J Palliat Med. 2015 Dec;18(12):1054-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0177. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
- Clark K, Connolly A, Clapham S, Quinsey K, Eagar K, Currow DC. Physical Symptoms at the Time of Dying Was Diagnosed: A Consecutive Cohort Study To Describe the Prevalence and Intensity of Problems Experienced by Imminently Dying Palliative Care Patients by Diagnosis and Place of Care. J Palliat Med. 2016 Dec;19(12):1288-1295. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
- Fokkema T, Kooiman TJ, Krijnen WP, VAN DER Schans CP, DE Groot M. Reliability and Validity of Ten Consumer Activity Trackers Depend on Walking Speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Apr;49(4):793-800. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001146.
- Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson IJ. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 15;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-7.
- Grande G, Rowland C, van den Berg B, Hanratty B. Psychological morbidity and general health among family caregivers during end-of-life cancer care: A retrospective census survey. Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1605-1614. doi: 10.1177/0269216318793286. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
- Hamidou Z, Auquier P, Leroy T, Barlesi F, Salas S, Chinot O, Baumstarck K. Dyadic effects of coping strategies, time perspectives, and personality on the quality of life of cancer patients and their caregivers. Psychooncology. 2018 Feb;27(2):590-599. doi: 10.1002/pon.4553. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
- Hawley P. Barriers to Access to Palliative Care. Palliat Care. 2017 Feb 20;10:1178224216688887. doi: 10.1177/1178224216688887. eCollection 2017. Review.
- Jacobs JM, Shaffer KM, Nipp RD, Fishbein JN, MacDonald J, El-Jawahri A, Pirl WF, Jackson VA, Park ER, Temel JS, Greer JA. Distress is Interdependent in Patients and Caregivers with Newly Diagnosed Incurable Cancers. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Aug;51(4):519-531. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9875-3.
- Kampshoff CS, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van Oijen MG, Sprangers MA, Buffart LM. Ecological momentary assessments among patients with cancer: A scoping review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13095. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13095. Epub 2019 May 14. Review.
- Kim J, Marcusson-Clavertz D, Yoshiuchi K, Smyth JM. Potential benefits of integrating ecological momentary assessment data into mHealth care systems. Biopsychosoc Med. 2019 Aug 9;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s13030-019-0160-5. eCollection 2019. Review.
- Lai B, Sasaki JE, Jeng B, Cederberg KL, Bamman MM, Motl RW. Accuracy and Precision of Three Consumer-Grade Motion Sensors During Overground and Treadmill Walking in People With Parkinson Disease: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jan 16;7(1):e14059. doi: 10.2196/14059.
- Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Clark MM, Kung S, Sloan JA, Rummans TA. Cancer Caregiver: Perceived Benefits of Technology. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Nov;21(11):893-902. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0117. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
- Lapid MI, Atherton PJ, Kung S, Sloan JA, Shahi V, Clark MM, Rummans TA. Cancer caregiver quality of life: need for targeted intervention. Psychooncology. 2016 Dec;25(12):1400-1407. doi: 10.1002/pon.3960. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
- LeBaron V, Hayes J, Gordon K, Alam R, Homdee N, Martinez Y, Ogunjirin E, Thomas T, Jones R, Blackhall L, Lach J. Leveraging Smart Health Technology to Empower Patients and Family Caregivers in Managing Cancer Pain: Protocol for a Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Dec 9;8(12):e16178. doi: 10.2196/16178.
- Mills J and Ven S. Future-proofing the palliative care workforce: Why wait for the future? ; 27(5): 203-205. DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2019.1661214. URL https://doi. org/10.1080/09699260.2019.1661214.
- Mills J, Fox J, Damarell R, Tieman J, Yates P. Palliative care providers' use of digital health and perspectives on technological innovation: a national study. BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 7;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00822-2.
- National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). & Australian Research Council. & Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. [Canberra : National Health and Medical Research Council]
- Pidgeon TM, Johnson CE, Lester L, Currow D, Yates P, Allingham SF, Bird S, Eagar K. Perceptions of the care received from Australian palliative care services: A caregiver perspective. Palliat Support Care. 2018 Apr;16(2):198-208. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000177. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
- Ryan T, Ingleton C, Gardiner C, Parker C, Gott M, Noble B. Symptom burden, palliative care need and predictors of physical and psychological discomfort in two UK hospitals. BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 26;12:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-11.
- Svarre FR, Jensen MM, Nielsen J, Villumsen M. The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart(®) HR and StepWatch(™) 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions. PeerJ. 2020 Jul 14;8:e9381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9381. eCollection 2020.
- Tedesco S, Sica M, Ancillao A, Timmons S, Barton J, O'Flynn B. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e13084. doi: 10.2196/13084.
- Wahid AS, Sayma M, Jamshaid S, Kerwat D, Oyewole F, Saleh D, Ahmed A, Cox B, Perry C, Payne S. Barriers and facilitators influencing death at home: A meta-ethnography. Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):314-328. doi: 10.1177/0269216317713427. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
- wePRO-CASA