Work of Breathing Assessment in Triage Scale
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The proposed research study will be a prospective observational study designed to validate the Canadian Triage Assessment Scale (CTAS) in regard to work of breathing in patients in the emergency department. The investigators will assess inter-rater agreement between nurses & emergency physicians for assessment of work of breathing.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Investigators will enroll a convenience sample of consenting patients who present to the emergency department with a chief complaint related to respiratory symptoms, including shortness of breath, cough, difficulty breathing, hypoxemia, or any other respiratory related complaint.
Following consent and in a blinded fashion, the nurse & emergency physician will be asked to evaluate the patient's work of breathing into three subjective categories: mild, moderate, or severe. The two evaluators will not be aware of the others evaluation of the patient. Evaluators will also be asked to predict the patients likely need for intervention & disposition.
Subsequently, investigators will perform a chart review to determine the patient's clinical interventions, outcomes, and dispositions, and evaluate the assessment of the patients work of breathing.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Patients with Respiratory Symptoms The Canadian Triage Assessment Scale (CTAS) will be assessed via patient survey form and electronic chart review. |
Other: Canadian Triage Assessment Scale (CTAS)
The CTAS incorporates work of breathing into a subjective measurement in its assessment of patients and triaged.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Inter-rater agreement between nurses and emergency physicians for the respiratory component of the Canadian Assessment Scale (CTAS) [24 months]
The CTAS is utilized to qualitatively define work of breathing as severe, moderate, or mild. Kappa will be calculated to assess inter-rater reliability
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 years of age of older
-
Presenting to the emergency department with a chief complaint of any type of respiratory symptom.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Under 18 years of age
-
Refusal to consent to study
-
Incarcerated patients
-
Pregnant patients
-
Unable to complete survey due to clinical instability, severe pain, or disorientation determined by a study physician.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital | Corpus Christi | Texas | United States | 78405 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- CHRISTUS Health
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Durand, DO, CHRISTUS Health
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Alquraini M, Awad E, Hijazi R. Reliability of Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;8(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0080-5. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
- Beveridge R, Ducharme J, Janes L, Beaulieu S, Walter S. Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;34(2):155-9.
- Horeczko T, Enriquez B, McGrath NE, Gausche-Hill M, Lewis RJ. The Pediatric Assessment Triangle: accuracy of its application by nurses in the triage of children. J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Mar;39(2):182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
- Hutchinson A, Pickering A, Williams P, Bland JM, Johnson MJ. Breathlessness and presentation to the emergency department: a survey and clinical record review. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0396-4.
- Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, Pons JP, Cortés EA, Garrigós JB, Ferré MB. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators? CJEM. 2003 Sep;5(5):315-22.
- Murray M, Bullard M, Grafstein E; CTAS Natioanal Working Group; CEDIS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. CJEM. 2004 Nov;6(6):421-7.
- Paniagua N, Elosegi A, Duo I, Fernandez A, Mojica E, Martinez-Indart L, Mintegi S, Benito J. Initial Asthma Severity Assessment Tools as Predictors of Hospitalization. J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
- Roussos C, Koutsoukou A. Respiratory failure. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003 Nov;47:3s-14s. Review.
- Rui P, Kang K, Albert M. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2013 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2013_ed_web_tables.pdf.
- 2020-195