ARM For SUBS: Integrated Approaches to Health and Safety in a Dynamic Construction Work Environment

Sponsor
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03781245
Collaborator
(none)
144
1
2
27.9
5.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

"All the Right Moves for Subcontractors" aims to improve safety, health and well-being, through the development of a communication infrastructure with supplemental tools where construction workers and company mangers (project, operations and safety) work together to collaboratively identify problems and strategies to improve their conditions of work. The intervention is grounded in the key characteristics of integrated organizational interventions to improve workers' health safety and well-being detailed in Harvard Center for Work, Health and Well-being's Implementation Guidelines (McLellan et al, 2016).

The intervention involves a cyclical approach through which the research team facilitate a participatory process to identify workers' health concerns, prioritize these concerns, use an action planning process to identify and operationalize solutions, and develop a company-specific evaluation plan to measure change. We will evaluate this program by measuring safety climate, health climate, pain and injury and health behaviors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: All the Right Moves for Subcontractors
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
144 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Integrated Approaches to Health and Safety in a Dynamic Construction Work Environment (All the Right Moves for Subcontractors)
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 24, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 28, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 20, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Early

Intervention is administered for cycle 1 and 2 with researchers and following this the company continues intervention independently.

Other: All the Right Moves for Subcontractors
"All the Right Moves for Subcontractors" aims to improve safety, health and wellbeing, through the development of a communication infrastructure with supplemental tools where construction workers and company mangers work together to collaboratively identify problems and strategies to improve their conditions of work. The intervention is grounded in the key characteristics of integrated organizational interventions to improve workers' health safety and wellbeing detailed in Harvard Center for Work, Health and Wellbeing's Implementation Guidelines (McLellan et al, 2016). The intervention involves a cyclical approach through which the research team facilitate a participatory process to identify workers' health concerns, prioritize these concerns, use an action planning process to identify and operationalize solutions, and develop a company-specific evaluation plan to measure change.
Other Names:
  • ARM for SUBS
  • Active Comparator: Lagged

    Intervention is not administered for cycle 1; researchers administer intervention in cycle 2 and following this the company continues intervention independently.

    Other: All the Right Moves for Subcontractors
    "All the Right Moves for Subcontractors" aims to improve safety, health and wellbeing, through the development of a communication infrastructure with supplemental tools where construction workers and company mangers work together to collaboratively identify problems and strategies to improve their conditions of work. The intervention is grounded in the key characteristics of integrated organizational interventions to improve workers' health safety and wellbeing detailed in Harvard Center for Work, Health and Wellbeing's Implementation Guidelines (McLellan et al, 2016). The intervention involves a cyclical approach through which the research team facilitate a participatory process to identify workers' health concerns, prioritize these concerns, use an action planning process to identify and operationalize solutions, and develop a company-specific evaluation plan to measure change.
    Other Names:
  • ARM for SUBS
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Worker Outcomes: Injury assessed by the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      NMQ has been applied to a wide range of occupational groups to evaluate musculoskeletal problems Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    2. Worker Outcomes: Pain assessed by the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      NMQ has been applied to a wide range of occupational groups to evaluate musculoskeletal problems Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    3. Enterprise Outcomes: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) measures impairment due to the specified problem and all health problems. Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    4. Enterprise Outcomes: Health Climate assessed by questions modified from safety climate scale for construction workers [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Questions adapted from safety climate scale: Jorgensen, E., Sokas, R. K., Nickels, L., Gao, W., & Gittleman, J. L. (2007). An English/Spanish safety climate scale for construction workers. American journal of industrial medicine, 50(6), 438-442. Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    5. Enterprise Outcomes: Safety Climate assessed by using the validated scale: An English/Spanish safety climate scale for construction workers. [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Jorgensen, E., Sokas, R. K., Nickels, L., Gao, W., & Gittleman, J. L. (2007). An English/Spanish safety climate scale for construction workers. American journal of industrial medicine, 50(6), 438-442. Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Worker Health Behaviors: Diet [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      PrimeScreen Questionnaire; Rifas-Shiman SL, Willett WC, Lobb R, Kotch J, Dart C, Gillman MW. PrimeScreen, a brief dietary screening tool: reproducibility and comparability with both a longer food frequency questionnaire and biomarkers. Public Health Nutr. 2001 Apr;4(2):249-54 Scale: 0-4 0:minimum 4:maximum

    2. Worker Health Behaviors: Leisure Physical Activity [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form)http://uacc.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/ipaq_english_telephone_short.pdf Scale: 0-7 days 0=minimum 7=maximum

    3. Worker Health Behaviors: Alcohol Use assessed by using validated questions from NIAAA [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Scale:0-9 0:minimum 9:maximum https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/guidelines-and-resources/recommended-alcohol-questions

    4. Worker Health Behaviors: Tobacco Use assessed by modifying questions from the National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS) [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Dichotomous questions adapted from the National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS) Scale:0-2 0:minimum 2:maximum

    5. Psychosocial Work Environment: Co-worker Support assessed by assessed by Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale. [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Uses questions from the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale by Karasek_et_al__1998 Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    6. Psychosocial Work Environment: Supervisor Support assessed by Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale. [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Uses questions from the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale by Karasek_et_al__1998 Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    7. Psychosocial Work Environment: Communication assessed by Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale. [Change from Baseline at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months]

      Uses questions from the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ), a validated scale by Karasek_et_al__1998 Scale:0-1 0:minimum 1:maximum

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • All workers employed by the recruited contractors at the eligible worksites
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Companies with less than 5 workers

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts United States 02115

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Jack Dennerlein, Associate Director, Center for Work, Health, & Well-being, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03781245
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB13-1948
    First Posted:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 10, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 10, 2021