A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Afamelanotide in Patients With Xeroderma Pigmentosum C and V

Sponsor
Clinuvel Europe Limited (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05370235
Collaborator
(none)
6
2
1
15.1
3
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The CUV152 study will evaluate the safety of afamelanotide in XP-C and XP-V patients, as well as the drug's ability to assist reparative processes following ultraviolet (UV) provoked DNA damage of the skin. It will assess whether SCENESSE® increases the amount of UV light needed to cause DNA damage of skin cells, as well as the extent of skin repair before and after treatment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
6 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Proof of Concept, Phase IIa, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Implants of Afamelanotide in Patients With Xeroderma Pigmentosum C and V (XPC and XPV)
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 28, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Afamelanotide

Drug: Afamelanotide
Patients will receive afamelanotide every two weeks for twelve weeks and undergo a follow up visit 6 months later.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in minimal erythema dose (MED) in patients with XP-C. [From baseline to day 76.]

    MED is the lowest dose of UV light that causes reddening of the skin.

  2. Change in MED in patients with XP-V. [From baseline to day 76.]

    MED is the lowest dose of UV light that causes reddening of the skin.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Changes in UV-induced DNA damage, as assessed by quantification of UV photoproduct levels in patients with XP-C. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Analysis of UV photoproducts from skin samples.

  2. Changes in UV-induced DNA damage repair capacity, as assessed by quantification of DNA repair mechanisms in patients with XP-C. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Analysis of DNA repair mechanisms from skin samples.

  3. Changes in UV-induced DNA damage, as assessed by quantification of UV photoproduct levels in patients with XP-V. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Analysis of UV photoproducts from skin samples.

  4. Changes in UV-induced DNA damage repair capacity, as assessed by quantification of DNA repair mechanisms in patients with XP-V. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Analysis of DNA repair mechanisms from skin samples.

  5. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (A). [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  6. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (A) [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  7. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (B). [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  8. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (B). [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  9. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (C). [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  10. Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (C). [From baseline to day 76.]

    The higher the score, the more severe the disease.

  11. Change in quality of life assessed by a disease specific tool (A) in patients with XP-C. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Higher scores represent worse health-related quality of life.

  12. Change in quality of life assessed by a disease specific tool (A) in patients with XP-V. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Higher scores represent worse health-related quality of life.

  13. Change in quality of life assessed by a validated global quality of life tool (B) in patients with XP-C. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Score calculated in impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impaired quality of life.

  14. Change in quality of life assessed by a validated global quality of life tool (B) in patients with XP-V. [From baseline to day 76.]

    Score calculated in impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impaired quality of life.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female patient with a molecular-genetically confirmed diagnosis of XP-C or XP-V;

  • Aged 18-75 years.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known allergy to afamelanotide or the polymer contained in the implant;

  • Presence of severe hepatic disease or hepatic impairment;

  • Renal impairment;

  • Any other medical condition which may interfere with the study protocol;

  • Existing melanoma;

  • Female who is pregnant or lactating;

  • Females of child-bearing potential (pre-menopausal, not surgically sterile) not using adequate contraceptive measures;

  • Sexually active man with a partner of child-bearing potential who is not using adequate contraceptive measures;

  • Use of any other prior and concomitant therapy which may interfere with the objective of the study;

  • Participation in a clinical trial for an investigational agent.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CLINUVEL Investigational site Clinuvel Investigational Site Belgium
2 CLINUVEL Investigational site Clinuvel Investigational Site Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Clinuvel Europe Limited

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Clinuvel Europe Limited
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05370235
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CUV152
First Posted:
May 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 11, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 11, 2022