Comparison of 12% Ammonium Lactate and 10% Urea Cream in Geriatric With Xerosis Cutis

Sponsor
Indonesia University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04127513
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
2
20.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety between moisturizing cream containing 12% ammonium lactate and 10% urea in geriatric with xerosis cutis. A double-blind randomized controlled trial with matching paired subject was conducted on 40 residents of a nursing home in Jakarta. Specified symptom sum score (SRRC), skin capacitance (SCap), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and side effects were measured at baseline, week-2 and week-4 after therapy, and week-5 one week after therapy cessation. After a week of preconditioning, each subject received two different moisturizing creams to be applied on separate lower limbs.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Dry skin or xerosis cutis is widely known skin health issue in geriatric population with prevalence rate ranges between 29.5 - 85.5%. One of the internal etiological factors is decreased production of natural moisturizing factor as a humectant. Application of moisturizer is the mainstay treatment. Moisturizer with humectant property, like lactate and urea, could restore skin hydration and barrier dysfunction. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety between moisturizing cream containing 12% ammonium lactate and 10% urea in geriatric with xerosis cutis.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Masking Description:
same vehicle base ingredients, colour, smell, and packaging
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Moisturising Cream Containing 12% Ammonium Lactate AND 10% Urea in Geriatric With Xerosis Cutis: Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 31, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 31, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 12% AMMONIUM LACTATE

Matching paired subject was conducted on 40 residents. Test subject received two different randomized moisturizing creams to be applied on two separate locations on the lower limbs twice a day for 4 weeks. One of the moisturising cream contained active ingredient 12% ammonium lactate. The evaluation of specified symptom sum score (SRRC), skin capacitance (SCap), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and side effects were measured at baseline, week-2 and week-4 after therapy, and week-5 one week after therapy cessation.

Drug: Ammonium Lactate
12% ammonium lactate moisturizing cream

Active Comparator: 10% UREA

Matching paired subject was conducted on 40 residents. Test subject received two different randomized moisturizing creams to be applied on two separate locations on the lower limbs twice a day for 4 weeks. One of the moisturising cream contained active ingredient 10% urea. The evaluation of specified symptom sum score (SRRC), skin capacitance (SCap), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and side effects were measured at baseline, week-2 and week-4 after therapy, and week-5 one week after therapy cessation.

Drug: Urea
10% urea moisturizing cream

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. First Evaluation of Specified Symptom Sum Score (SRRC) [initial visit (day 1)]

    System with grading of scaliness, roughness, redness, and cracks with score ranges from 0-12 because the redness and cracks scores were limited to 2. Performed before therapy.

  2. Second Evaluation of Specified Symptom Sum Score (SRRC) [Change of SSRC at day 15 from initial visit]

    System with grading of scaliness, roughness, redness, and cracks with score ranges from 0-12 because the redness and cracks scores were limited to 2. Performed during therapy.

  3. Third Evaluation of Specified Symptom Sum Score (SRRC) [Change of SSRC at day 29 from initial visit]

    System with grading of scaliness, roughness, redness, and cracks with score ranges from 0-12 because the redness and cracks scores were limited to 2. Performed during therapy.

  4. Fourth Evaluation of Specified Symptom Sum Score (SRRC) [Change of SSRC at day 36]

    System with grading of scaliness, roughness, redness, and cracks with score ranges from 0-12 because the redness and cracks scores were limited to 2. Performed after 1 week of therapy discontinuation

  5. First Evaluation of Skin Capacitance (SCap) [Performed at initial visit (day-1)]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage - Khazaka, Germany). Performed before therapy.

  6. Second Evaluation of Skin Capacitance (SCap) [Change of SCap at day-15]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage - Khazaka, Germany). Performed during therapy.

  7. Third Evaluation of Skin Capacitance (SCap) [Change of SCap at day-29]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage - Khazaka, Germany). Performed during therapy.

  8. Fourth Evaluation of Skin Capacitance (SCap) [Change of SCap at day-36]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Corneometer® CM 825 (Courage - Khazaka, Germany). Performed after 1 week of therapy discontinuation

  9. First Evaluation of Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) [Performed at initial visit (day-1)]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Tewameter® TM300 before therapy.

  10. Second Evaluation of Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) [Change of TEWL at day-15 from initial visit]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Tewameter® TM300. Performed during therapy.

  11. Third Evaluation of Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) [Change of TEWL at day-29 from initial visit]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Tewameter® TM300. Performed during therapy.

  12. Fourth Evaluation of Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) [Change of TEWL at day-36 from initial visit]

    Assess the skin barrier homeostasis condition using Tewameter® TM300. Performed after 1 week of therapy discontinuation.

  13. First Side Effect Evaluation [Performed at 2 weeks after therapy (day-15)]

    Subjective by the presence of contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and miliaria; objective by complaints of pruritus, sore, or stinging.

  14. Second Side Effect Evaluation [Performed at day-29 (4 weeks after therapy)]

    Subjective by the presence of contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and miliaria; objective by complaints of pruritus, sore, or stinging.

  15. Third Side Effect Evaluation [Performed at day-36 (5 weeks after therapy)]

    Subjective by the presence of contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and miliaria; objective by complaints of pruritus, sore, or stinging. Performed after 1 week of therapy discontinuation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • presenting with clinical diagnosis of xerosis cutis or with using the specified symptom sum score (SRRC)

  • able to communicate well and perform daily activities independently

  • willing to follow the research and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • sensitive to the ingredients in the formulations

  • suffer from dermatitis or skin inflammation at the test site

  • erythema and fissure values based on SRRC value >2

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia Jakarta Pusat DKI Jakarta Indonesia 10340

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Indonesia University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Eyleny Meisyah Fitri, Principal Investigator, Indonesia University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04127513
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ThesisEyleny
First Posted:
Oct 15, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Oct 15, 2019
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Eyleny Meisyah Fitri, Principal Investigator, Indonesia University

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 15, 2019