BOLT: A Phase II Study of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma

Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01327053
Collaborator
(none)
230
62
2
84
3.7
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral treatment with two dose levels of LDE225 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
230 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Phase II, Randomized Double-blind Study of Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of LDE225 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 29, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 28, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 29, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: LDE225 200 mg

The study was double blinded and enrolled at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

Drug: LDE225
LDE225 was administered orally, on a continuous once daily dosing schedule and was supplied as 200 mg hard gelatin capsules in bottles. Every 4 weeks on the day of study visit, patients received a prescription of an adequate drug supply for self-administration at home. The 800 mg dose patients received 4 capsules of LDE225 and 200 mg dose arm patients received 1 LDE225 capsule + 3 placebo capsules.
Other Names:
  • Sonidegib
  • Experimental: LDE225 800 mg

    The study was double blinded and enrolled at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.

    Drug: LDE225
    LDE225 was administered orally, on a continuous once daily dosing schedule and was supplied as 200 mg hard gelatin capsules in bottles. Every 4 weeks on the day of study visit, patients received a prescription of an adequate drug supply for self-administration at home. The 800 mg dose patients received 4 capsules of LDE225 and 200 mg dose arm patients received 1 LDE225 capsule + 3 placebo capsules.
    Other Names:
  • Sonidegib
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) [6 months]

      ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) [6 months]

      ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.

    2. Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]

      Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Median DoR for patients with laBCC was non-estimable for both treatment arms. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    3. Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (pEAS) [42 months]

      Rate of complete response is the percentage of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR was determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" were treated as non responders. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    4. Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (FAS) [6 months]

      Rate of complete response is the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR will be determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" will be treated as non responders

    5. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.

    6. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]

      Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.

    7. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    8. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]

      Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    9. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) [42 months]

      ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    10. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) [42 months]

      ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    11. Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.

    12. Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]

      Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    13. Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.

    14. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]

      Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.

    15. Plasma Concentration of Sonidegib (LDE225) [Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 33, 45, 57, 69]

      Blood PK samples were collected either by direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein for the determination of trough (Cmin) plasma concentrations of sonidegib and its main circulating metabolite, LGE899, from all patients who enrolled in the study. Blood was collected in Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9 (pre-dose), and subsequently pre-dose every 4 weeks up to Week 21, and every 12 weeks thereafter up to week 69.

    16. Overall Survival (OS) [42 months]

      OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause or the last date that a patient was known to be alive (censored observation) as of the data cut-off.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC

    • Patients with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients who had had major surgery within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication

    • Patients unable to take oral drugs or with lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or known malabsorption syndromes.

    • Patients with concurrent medical conditions that may interfere or potentially affect the interpretation of the study.

    • Patients with neuromuscular disorders or are on concurrent treatment with drugs that may cause muscle damage.

    • Patients who were on concurrent therapy with other anti-neoplastic agents.

    • Patients who had taken part in an experimental drug within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication.

    • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

    • Women of child bearing potential unwilling to use 2 forms of highly effective contraception throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment

    • Fertile males not willing to use condoms throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment.

    • Patients who were unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Highlands Oncology Group Fayetteville Arkansas United States 72703
    2 University of California at Los Angeles UCLA 3 Los Angeles California United States 90095
    3 Stanford University Medical Center Stanford Univ 2 Stanford California United States 94304
    4 University of Colorado School of Medicine UC Aurora Colorado United States 80045
    5 Washington Hospital Center Wash Hospital Washington District of Columbia United States 20010
    6 H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Cutaneous Onc Dept Tampa Florida United States 33612
    7 NorthwesternUniv.Med.School/Robert H. Lurie Comp.Cancer Ctr Study coordinator Chicago Illinois United States 60611
    8 Dana Farber Cancer Institute DFCI - MA Boston Massachusetts United States 02215
    9 Henry Ford Hospital Henry Ford Detroit Michigan United States 48202 2689
    10 Washington University School Of Medicine-Siteman Cancer Ctr Siteman Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
    11 Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada CCC of Nevada- Southwest (2) Las Vegas Nevada United States 89109
    12 Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack (SC) Hackensack New Jersey United States 07601
    13 New York University Medical Center SC-2 New York New York United States 10016
    14 Penn State University / Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Medical Hershey Pennsylvania United States 17033-085
    15 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15213
    16 Baylor Health Care System/Sammons Cancer Center Baylor Texas Oncology Dallas Texas United States 75246
    17 Texas Oncology Tex Onc 3 Dallas Texas United States 75246
    18 Texas Oncology Texas Onc - Amarillo Dallas Texas United States 75246
    19 University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center MD Anderson Houston Texas United States 77030
    20 Texas Oncology Cancer Care & Research Center Waco Texas United States 76712
    21 Texoma Cancer Center Texoma Cancer Center Wichita Falls Texas United States 76310
    22 University of Utah / Huntsman Cancer Institute Huntsman/Univ UT Salt Lake City Utah United States 84103
    23 Novartis Investigative Site St Leonards New South Wales Australia 2065
    24 Novartis Investigative Site Geelong Victoria Australia 3220
    25 Novartis Investigative Site Bruxelles Belgium 1200
    26 Novartis Investigative Site Wilrijk Belgium 2610
    27 Novartis Investigative Site Waterloo Ontario Canada N2J 1C4
    28 Novartis Investigative Site Sainte-Foy Quebec Canada G1V 4T3
    29 Novartis Investigative Site Lyon Cedex France 69373
    30 Novartis Investigative Site Marseille Cedex 05 France 13885
    31 Novartis Investigative Site Pierre Benite Cedex France 69495
    32 Novartis Investigative Site Toulouse Cedex 9 France 31059
    33 Novartis Investigative Site Villejuif Cedex France 94805
    34 Novartis Investigative Site Berlin Germany 13353
    35 Novartis Investigative Site Essen Germany 45147
    36 Novartis Investigative Site Freiburg Germany 79106
    37 Novartis Investigative Site Gera Germany 07548
    38 Novartis Investigative Site Hannover Germany 30625
    39 Novartis Investigative Site Kiel Germany 24105
    40 Novartis Investigative Site Mainz Germany 55131
    41 Novartis Investigative Site Muenchen Germany 81377
    42 Novartis Investigative Site Muenster Germany 48157
    43 Novartis Investigative Site Stade Germany 21682
    44 Novartis Investigative Site Athens Greece 161 21
    45 Novartis Investigative Site Budapest Hungary H-1085
    46 Novartis Investigative Site Debrecen Hungary 4032
    47 Novartis Investigative Site Szeged Hungary H-6725
    48 Novartis Investigative Site Torino TO Italy 10126
    49 Novartis Investigative Site Napoli Italy 80131
    50 Novartis Investigative Site Barcelona Catalunya Spain 08035
    51 Novartis Investigative Site Madrid Spain 28034
    52 Novartis Investigative Site Madrid Spain 28046
    53 Novartis Investigative Site Bern Switzerland 3010
    54 Novartis Investigative Site Geneve Switzerland 1211
    55 Novartis Investigative Site Zürich Switzerland 8091
    56 Novartis Investigative Site High Heaton Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom NE7 7DN
    57 Novartis Investigative Site Yeovil Somerset United Kingdom BA21 4AT
    58 Novartis Investigative Site Cardiff United Kingdom CF14 4XW
    59 Novartis Investigative Site Glasgow United Kingdom G3 8SJ
    60 Novartis Investigative Site Leicester United Kingdom LE1 5WW
    61 Novartis Investigative Site London United Kingdom EC1A 7BE
    62 Novartis Investigative Site Manchester United Kingdom M13 9WL

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01327053
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CLDE225A2201
    • 2010-022629-14
    First Posted:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 28, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Randomization was stratified across the two treatment arms according to the stage of disease (laBCC or mBCC), histological subtype (non-aggressive or aggressive for laBCC patients) and the regions (Australia, Europe, and North America).
    Pre-assignment Detail All eligible, enrolled patients were randomized in 1:2 ratio to sonidegib treatment with either 200 mg or 800 mg once-daily dose. In total, 230 patients were evaluated as FAS population: 79 and 151 patients randomized to 200mg and 800 mg sonidegib respectively. However, 1 patient randomized to 800 mg sonidegib did not receive study treatment.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200 mg LDE225 (Sonidegib) 800 mg
    Arm/Group Description The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 79 151
    Untreated 0 1
    Patients Cont. to Next Phase of Trial 52 89
    Survival Follow-up 33 49
    Post-treatment Follow-up 19 40
    COMPLETED 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 79 151

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200 mg LDE225 (Sonidegib) 800 mg Total
    Arm/Group Description The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 79 151 230
    Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
    65.6
    (15.67)
    63.6
    (14.59)
    64.3
    (14.96)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    31
    39.2%
    55
    36.4%
    86
    37.4%
    Male
    48
    60.8%
    96
    63.6%
    144
    62.6%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
    Black
    0
    0%
    1
    0.7%
    1
    0.4%
    Caucasian
    71
    89.9%
    145
    96%
    216
    93.9%
    Other
    8
    10.1%
    5
    3.3%
    13
    5.7%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS)
    Description ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    42.9
    54.3%
    37.6
    24.9%
    15.4
    6.7%
    17.4
    NaN
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS)
    Description ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients).
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    47.0
    59.5%
    35.2
    23.3%
    15.4
    6.7%
    17.4
    NaN
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    12.9
    23.7
    24.0
    NA
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS)
    Description Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Median DoR for patients with laBCC was non-estimable for both treatment arms. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    26.1
    23.3
    24.0
    NA
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (pEAS)
    Description Rate of complete response is the percentage of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR was determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" were treated as non responders. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    4.8
    6.1%
    2.2
    1.5%
    0.0
    0%
    0.0
    NaN
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (FAS)
    Description Rate of complete response is the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR will be determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" will be treated as non responders
    Time Frame 6 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    3.0
    3.8%
    0.0
    0%
    0.0
    0%
    0.0
    NaN
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    19.0
    19.4
    13.1
    11.1
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS)
    Description Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients).
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    22.1
    24.9
    13.1
    11.1
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    4.0
    3.7
    9.2
    1.0
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS)
    Description Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients).
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    4.0
    3.7
    9.2
    1.0
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS)
    Description ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    71.4
    90.4%
    61.3
    40.6%
    23.1
    10%
    34.8
    NaN
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS)
    Description ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients).
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants]
    71.2
    90.1%
    58.6
    38.8%
    23.1
    10%
    34.8
    NaN
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    18.2
    26.0
    18.1
    10.2
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS)
    Description Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    15.7
    26.0
    18.1
    10.2
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    20.1
    28.0
    13.1
    14.3
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS)
    Description Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 42 93 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    1.9
    1.8
    1.0
    2.7
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Concentration of Sonidegib (LDE225)
    Description Blood PK samples were collected either by direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein for the determination of trough (Cmin) plasma concentrations of sonidegib and its main circulating metabolite, LGE899, from all patients who enrolled in the study. Blood was collected in Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9 (pre-dose), and subsequently pre-dose every 4 weeks up to Week 21, and every 12 weeks thereafter up to week 69.
    Time Frame Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 33, 45, 57, 69

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The PK analysis set (PAS) consisted of all patients with at least one evaluable plasma concentration.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200 mg qd LDE225 800 mg qd
    Arm/Group Description Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 73 139
    Week 1 (0 h (pre-dose))
    NA
    (NA)
    NA
    (NA)
    Week 3 (0 h (pre-dose))
    207.76
    (78.29)
    586.76
    (97.13)
    Week 5 (0 h (pre-dose))
    372.26
    (68.89)
    1012.63
    (70.42)
    Week 9 (0 h (pre-dose))
    559.29
    (67.30)
    1353.06
    (63.43)
    Week 13 (0 h (pre-dose))
    714.01
    (60.79)
    1443.84
    (61.57)
    Week 17 (0 h (pre-dose))
    688.93
    (64.43)
    1574.21
    (59.88)
    Week 17 (1 h (post-dose))
    841.78
    (52.57)
    1803.74
    (39.47)
    Week 17 (2 h (post-dose))
    939.56
    (50.79)
    1922.38
    (34.90)
    Week 17 (4 h (post-dose))
    842.31
    (62.22)
    1750.70
    (53.32)
    Week 17 (6 h (post-dose))
    759.88
    (63.43)
    1673.95
    (41.53)
    Week 21 (0 h (pre-dose))
    707.49
    (63.58)
    1547.41
    (63.92)
    Week 33 (0 h (pre-dose))
    702.67
    (93.11)
    1477.60
    (74.80)
    Week 45 (0 h (pre-dose))
    697.92
    (76.02)
    1368.87
    (79.60)
    Week 57 (0 h (pre-dose))
    559.17
    (117.27)
    1257.42
    (78.96)
    Wek 69 (0 h (pre-dose))
    530.91
    (154.33)
    1355.91
    (89.03)
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Survival (OS)
    Description OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause or the last date that a patient was known to be alive (censored observation) as of the data cut-off.
    Time Frame 42 months

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200mg laBCC LDE225 800mg laBCC LDE225 200mg mBCC LDE225 800mg mBCC
    Arm/Group Description The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    Measure Participants 66 128 13 23
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    NA
    NA
    47.6
    33.8

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected for the maximum actual duration of treatment exposure and follow up for a participant per the protocol for approximately 76.2 months.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description All cause mortality (deaths) was collected for as long as participants could be contacted from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV) up to a maximum of approx. 7 years.
    Arm/Group Title LDE225 200 mg qd LDE225 800 mg qd
    Arm/Group Description Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent.
    All Cause Mortality
    LDE225 200 mg qd LDE225 800 mg qd
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/79 (1.3%) 7/150 (4.7%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    LDE225 200 mg qd LDE225 800 mg qd
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 16/79 (20.3%) 58/150 (38.7%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 0/79 (0%) 5/150 (3.3%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina pectoris 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Atrial fibrillation 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Bradycardia 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Bundle branch block left 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Cardiac arrest 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Cardiac failure congestive 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Cardiovascular insufficiency 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Sinus tachycardia 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Chronic gastritis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Constipation 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Diarrhoea 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Duodenal stenosis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Duodenal ulcer 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Gastric ulcer 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Gastritis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Gastritis erosive 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Gastrointestinal pain 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Nausea 0/79 (0%) 3/150 (2%)
    Pancreatitis acute 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Peptic ulcer perforation 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Small intestinal obstruction 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Vomiting 0/79 (0%) 4/150 (2.7%)
    General disorders
    Cardiac death 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Facial pain 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    General physical health deterioration 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Pain 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholelithiasis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Hepatotoxicity 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Infections and infestations
    Abscess 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Abscess limb 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Bronchitis 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Cellulitis 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Endocarditis 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Escherichia urinary tract infection 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Lower respiratory tract infection 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Mastoiditis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Otitis media 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Parotitis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Pneumonia 2/79 (2.5%) 3/150 (2%)
    Pseudomonas infection 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Sepsis 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Septic shock 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Superinfection 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Urinary tract infection 1/79 (1.3%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Arthropod bite 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Cervical vertebral fracture 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Fall 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Femoral neck fracture 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Joint dislocation 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Lumbar vertebral fracture 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Spinal fracture 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Upper limb fracture 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Investigations
    Blood creatine phosphokinase MB increased 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Blood creatine phosphokinase increased 1/79 (1.3%) 6/150 (4%)
    Lipase increased 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Myoglobin blood increased 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Weight decreased 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Dehydration 1/79 (1.3%) 3/150 (2%)
    Failure to thrive 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Hypoglycaemia 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Muscle contracture 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Muscular weakness 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Myositis 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Osteonecrosis of jaw 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Rhabdomyolysis 1/79 (1.3%) 5/150 (3.3%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    B-cell lymphoma 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Basal cell carcinoma 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Brain neoplasm 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Invasive papillary breast carcinoma 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Lung neoplasm 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Malignant melanoma 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Prostate cancer 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Squamous cell carcinoma 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Transitional cell carcinoma 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Dysgeusia 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Haemorrhage intracranial 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Paraesthesia 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Somnolence 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Syncope 1/79 (1.3%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Bipolar disorder 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Mental status changes 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Acute kidney injury 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Bladder obstruction 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Haematuria 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Nephropathy toxic 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Uterine prolapse 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Bronchitis chronic 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Dyspnoea 1/79 (1.3%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Emphysema 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Pleural effusion 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Respiratory arrest 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Rhinorrhoea 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Sputum discoloured 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Skin lesion 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Vascular disorders
    Arterial haemorrhage 0/79 (0%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Deep vein thrombosis 0/79 (0%) 2/150 (1.3%)
    Hypotension 1/79 (1.3%) 1/150 (0.7%)
    Orthostatic hypotension 1/79 (1.3%) 0/150 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    LDE225 200 mg qd LDE225 800 mg qd
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 76/79 (96.2%) 145/150 (96.7%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 4/79 (5.1%) 13/150 (8.7%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo 0/79 (0%) 11/150 (7.3%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 8/79 (10.1%) 9/150 (6%)
    Abdominal pain upper 7/79 (8.9%) 12/150 (8%)
    Constipation 6/79 (7.6%) 24/150 (16%)
    Diarrhoea 25/79 (31.6%) 34/150 (22.7%)
    Dry mouth 4/79 (5.1%) 8/150 (5.3%)
    Nausea 31/79 (39.2%) 71/150 (47.3%)
    Vomiting 9/79 (11.4%) 41/150 (27.3%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 10/79 (12.7%) 9/150 (6%)
    Fatigue 26/79 (32.9%) 55/150 (36.7%)
    Pyrexia 4/79 (5.1%) 5/150 (3.3%)
    Infections and infestations
    Influenza 4/79 (5.1%) 8/150 (5.3%)
    Nasopharyngitis 8/79 (10.1%) 17/150 (11.3%)
    Pneumonia 4/79 (5.1%) 3/150 (2%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 5/79 (6.3%) 11/150 (7.3%)
    Urinary tract infection 7/79 (8.9%) 7/150 (4.7%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Fall 5/79 (6.3%) 5/150 (3.3%)
    Investigations
    Blood creatine phosphokinase increased 23/79 (29.1%) 54/150 (36%)
    Lipase increased 6/79 (7.6%) 13/150 (8.7%)
    Weight decreased 24/79 (30.4%) 64/150 (42.7%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 18/79 (22.8%) 52/150 (34.7%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 13/79 (16.5%) 17/150 (11.3%)
    Back pain 6/79 (7.6%) 16/150 (10.7%)
    Muscle spasms 43/79 (54.4%) 104/150 (69.3%)
    Muscular weakness 4/79 (5.1%) 8/150 (5.3%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 4/79 (5.1%) 7/150 (4.7%)
    Myalgia 15/79 (19%) 42/150 (28%)
    Pain in extremity 5/79 (6.3%) 8/150 (5.3%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Squamous cell carcinoma 4/79 (5.1%) 5/150 (3.3%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Ageusia 1/79 (1.3%) 15/150 (10%)
    Dizziness 7/79 (8.9%) 15/150 (10%)
    Dysgeusia 35/79 (44.3%) 89/150 (59.3%)
    Headache 12/79 (15.2%) 20/150 (13.3%)
    Hypogeusia 0/79 (0%) 9/150 (6%)
    Paraesthesia 4/79 (5.1%) 6/150 (4%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression 5/79 (6.3%) 9/150 (6%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 7/79 (8.9%) 11/150 (7.3%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 4/79 (5.1%) 6/150 (4%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia 39/79 (49.4%) 87/150 (58%)
    Pruritus 6/79 (7.6%) 12/150 (8%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 8/79 (10.1%) 16/150 (10.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    230 patients evaluated in the Full Analysis Set: 79 randomized to LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200mg group & 151 randomized to LDE225 800mg group. 1 patient randomized to the 800mg group did not receive study treatment & thus was not counted in the Safety Set.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Study Director
    Organization Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    Phone 862-778-8300
    Email Novartis.email@novartis.com
    Responsible Party:
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01327053
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CLDE225A2201
    • 2010-022629-14
    First Posted:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 28, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2019