BOLT: A Phase II Study of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral treatment with two dose levels of LDE225 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BCC.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: LDE225 200 mg The study was double blinded and enrolled at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Drug: LDE225
LDE225 was administered orally, on a continuous once daily dosing schedule and was supplied as 200 mg hard gelatin capsules in bottles. Every 4 weeks on the day of study visit, patients received a prescription of an adequate drug supply for self-administration at home. The 800 mg dose patients received 4 capsules of LDE225 and 200 mg dose arm patients received 1 LDE225 capsule + 3 placebo capsules.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: LDE225 800 mg The study was double blinded and enrolled at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 was analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Drug: LDE225
LDE225 was administered orally, on a continuous once daily dosing schedule and was supplied as 200 mg hard gelatin capsules in bottles. Every 4 weeks on the day of study visit, patients received a prescription of an adequate drug supply for self-administration at home. The 800 mg dose patients received 4 capsules of LDE225 and 200 mg dose arm patients received 1 LDE225 capsule + 3 placebo capsules.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) [6 months]
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) [6 months]
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.
- Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]
Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Median DoR for patients with laBCC was non-estimable for both treatment arms. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (pEAS) [42 months]
Rate of complete response is the percentage of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR was determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" were treated as non responders. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (FAS) [6 months]
Rate of complete response is the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR will be determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" will be treated as non responders
- Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
- Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]
Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
- Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]
Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) [42 months]
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) [42 months]
ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2.
- Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) [42 months]
Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
- Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) [42 months]
Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm.
- Plasma Concentration of Sonidegib (LDE225) [Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 33, 45, 57, 69]
Blood PK samples were collected either by direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein for the determination of trough (Cmin) plasma concentrations of sonidegib and its main circulating metabolite, LGE899, from all patients who enrolled in the study. Blood was collected in Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9 (pre-dose), and subsequently pre-dose every 4 weeks up to Week 21, and every 12 weeks thereafter up to week 69.
- Overall Survival (OS) [42 months]
OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause or the last date that a patient was known to be alive (censored observation) as of the data cut-off.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC
-
Patients with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who had had major surgery within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication
-
Patients unable to take oral drugs or with lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or known malabsorption syndromes.
-
Patients with concurrent medical conditions that may interfere or potentially affect the interpretation of the study.
-
Patients with neuromuscular disorders or are on concurrent treatment with drugs that may cause muscle damage.
-
Patients who were on concurrent therapy with other anti-neoplastic agents.
-
Patients who had taken part in an experimental drug within 4 weeks of initiation of study medication.
-
Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
-
Women of child bearing potential unwilling to use 2 forms of highly effective contraception throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment
-
Fertile males not willing to use condoms throughout the study and for 3 months after the last treatment.
-
Patients who were unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Highlands Oncology Group | Fayetteville | Arkansas | United States | 72703 |
2 | University of California at Los Angeles UCLA 3 | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90095 |
3 | Stanford University Medical Center Stanford Univ 2 | Stanford | California | United States | 94304 |
4 | University of Colorado School of Medicine UC | Aurora | Colorado | United States | 80045 |
5 | Washington Hospital Center Wash Hospital | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | 20010 |
6 | H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Cutaneous Onc Dept | Tampa | Florida | United States | 33612 |
7 | NorthwesternUniv.Med.School/Robert H. Lurie Comp.Cancer Ctr Study coordinator | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
8 | Dana Farber Cancer Institute DFCI - MA | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02215 |
9 | Henry Ford Hospital Henry Ford | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48202 2689 |
10 | Washington University School Of Medicine-Siteman Cancer Ctr Siteman | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63110 |
11 | Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada CCC of Nevada- Southwest (2) | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States | 89109 |
12 | Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack (SC) | Hackensack | New Jersey | United States | 07601 |
13 | New York University Medical Center SC-2 | New York | New York | United States | 10016 |
14 | Penn State University / Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Medical | Hershey | Pennsylvania | United States | 17033-085 |
15 | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15213 |
16 | Baylor Health Care System/Sammons Cancer Center Baylor Texas Oncology | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75246 |
17 | Texas Oncology Tex Onc 3 | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75246 |
18 | Texas Oncology Texas Onc - Amarillo | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75246 |
19 | University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center MD Anderson | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
20 | Texas Oncology Cancer Care & Research Center | Waco | Texas | United States | 76712 |
21 | Texoma Cancer Center Texoma Cancer Center | Wichita Falls | Texas | United States | 76310 |
22 | University of Utah / Huntsman Cancer Institute Huntsman/Univ UT | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States | 84103 |
23 | Novartis Investigative Site | St Leonards | New South Wales | Australia | 2065 |
24 | Novartis Investigative Site | Geelong | Victoria | Australia | 3220 |
25 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bruxelles | Belgium | 1200 | |
26 | Novartis Investigative Site | Wilrijk | Belgium | 2610 | |
27 | Novartis Investigative Site | Waterloo | Ontario | Canada | N2J 1C4 |
28 | Novartis Investigative Site | Sainte-Foy | Quebec | Canada | G1V 4T3 |
29 | Novartis Investigative Site | Lyon Cedex | France | 69373 | |
30 | Novartis Investigative Site | Marseille Cedex 05 | France | 13885 | |
31 | Novartis Investigative Site | Pierre Benite Cedex | France | 69495 | |
32 | Novartis Investigative Site | Toulouse Cedex 9 | France | 31059 | |
33 | Novartis Investigative Site | Villejuif Cedex | France | 94805 | |
34 | Novartis Investigative Site | Berlin | Germany | 13353 | |
35 | Novartis Investigative Site | Essen | Germany | 45147 | |
36 | Novartis Investigative Site | Freiburg | Germany | 79106 | |
37 | Novartis Investigative Site | Gera | Germany | 07548 | |
38 | Novartis Investigative Site | Hannover | Germany | 30625 | |
39 | Novartis Investigative Site | Kiel | Germany | 24105 | |
40 | Novartis Investigative Site | Mainz | Germany | 55131 | |
41 | Novartis Investigative Site | Muenchen | Germany | 81377 | |
42 | Novartis Investigative Site | Muenster | Germany | 48157 | |
43 | Novartis Investigative Site | Stade | Germany | 21682 | |
44 | Novartis Investigative Site | Athens | Greece | 161 21 | |
45 | Novartis Investigative Site | Budapest | Hungary | H-1085 | |
46 | Novartis Investigative Site | Debrecen | Hungary | 4032 | |
47 | Novartis Investigative Site | Szeged | Hungary | H-6725 | |
48 | Novartis Investigative Site | Torino | TO | Italy | 10126 |
49 | Novartis Investigative Site | Napoli | Italy | 80131 | |
50 | Novartis Investigative Site | Barcelona | Catalunya | Spain | 08035 |
51 | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Spain | 28034 | |
52 | Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Spain | 28046 | |
53 | Novartis Investigative Site | Bern | Switzerland | 3010 | |
54 | Novartis Investigative Site | Geneve | Switzerland | 1211 | |
55 | Novartis Investigative Site | Zürich | Switzerland | 8091 | |
56 | Novartis Investigative Site | High Heaton | Newcastle Upon Tyne | United Kingdom | NE7 7DN |
57 | Novartis Investigative Site | Yeovil | Somerset | United Kingdom | BA21 4AT |
58 | Novartis Investigative Site | Cardiff | United Kingdom | CF14 4XW | |
59 | Novartis Investigative Site | Glasgow | United Kingdom | G3 8SJ | |
60 | Novartis Investigative Site | Leicester | United Kingdom | LE1 5WW | |
61 | Novartis Investigative Site | London | United Kingdom | EC1A 7BE | |
62 | Novartis Investigative Site | Manchester | United Kingdom | M13 9WL |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CLDE225A2201
- 2010-022629-14
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Randomization was stratified across the two treatment arms according to the stage of disease (laBCC or mBCC), histological subtype (non-aggressive or aggressive for laBCC patients) and the regions (Australia, Europe, and North America). |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | All eligible, enrolled patients were randomized in 1:2 ratio to sonidegib treatment with either 200 mg or 800 mg once-daily dose. In total, 230 patients were evaluated as FAS population: 79 and 151 patients randomized to 200mg and 800 mg sonidegib respectively. However, 1 patient randomized to 800 mg sonidegib did not receive study treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200 mg | LDE225 (Sonidegib) 800 mg |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 79 | 151 |
Untreated | 0 | 1 |
Patients Cont. to Next Phase of Trial | 52 | 89 |
Survival Follow-up | 33 | 49 |
Post-treatment Follow-up | 19 | 40 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 79 | 151 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 (Sonidegib) 200 mg | LDE225 (Sonidegib) 800 mg | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 50 evaluable patients in the 200 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The study is double blinded and will enroll at least 100 evaluable patients in the 800 mg LDE225 arm. The efficacy and safety of LDE225 will be analyzed separately in each group. Patients who meet all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will be treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 79 | 151 | 230 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
65.6
(15.67)
|
63.6
(14.59)
|
64.3
(14.96)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
31
39.2%
|
55
36.4%
|
86
37.4%
|
Male |
48
60.8%
|
96
63.6%
|
144
62.6%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number] | |||
Black |
0
0%
|
1
0.7%
|
1
0.4%
|
Caucasian |
71
89.9%
|
145
96%
|
216
93.9%
|
Other |
8
10.1%
|
5
3.3%
|
13
5.7%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
42.9
54.3%
|
37.6
24.9%
|
15.4
6.7%
|
17.4
NaN
|
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Central Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
47.0
59.5%
|
35.2
23.3%
|
15.4
6.7%
|
17.4
NaN
|
Title | Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
12.9
|
23.7
|
24.0
|
NA
|
Title | Duration of Response (DoR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Median DoR for patients with laBCC was non-estimable for both treatment arms. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
26.1
|
23.3
|
24.0
|
NA
|
Title | Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Rate of complete response is the percentage of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR was determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" were treated as non responders. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
4.8
6.1%
|
2.2
1.5%
|
0.0
0%
|
0.0
NaN
|
Title | Complete Response Rate (CRR) Per Central Review (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | Rate of complete response is the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) after starting LDE225 treatment. The rate of CR will be determined according to mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC. Patients with best overall response of 'Unknown" will be treated as non responders |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
3.0
3.8%
|
0.0
0%
|
0.0
0%
|
0.0
NaN
|
Title | Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
19.0
|
19.4
|
13.1
|
11.1
|
Title | Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, PFS is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
22.1
|
24.9
|
13.1
|
11.1
|
Title | Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
4.0
|
3.7
|
9.2
|
1.0
|
Title | Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Central Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
4.0
|
3.7
|
9.2
|
1.0
|
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (for Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment. Treatment with sonidegib was considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
71.4
90.4%
|
61.3
40.6%
|
23.1
10%
|
34.8
NaN
|
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Site Investigator Review According to mRECIST (for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (laBCC)) and RECIST 1.1 (Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma (mBCC)) Per Full Analysis Set (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | ORR is the percentage of patient's objective response (ORR) by 6 months after starting LDE225 treatment. A responder was defined as a subject with confirmed partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) 42 months after starting LDE225 treatment.Treatment with sonidegib was to be considered sufficiently efficacious if the observed ORR on any treatment arm at the end of the study was 30% or higher. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants] |
71.2
90.1%
|
58.6
38.8%
|
23.1
10%
|
34.8
NaN
|
Title | Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm2. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
18.2
|
26.0
|
18.1
|
10.2
|
Title | Duration of Response (DoR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (FAS) |
---|---|
Description | Duration of response is the time from the first observed confirmed response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death due to any reason. Duration of response was for participants with ORR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
15.7
|
26.0
|
18.1
|
10.2
|
Title | Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
20.1
|
28.0
|
13.1
|
14.3
|
Title | Time to Tumor Response (TTR) Per Site Investigator Review Using mRECIST for laBCC and RECIST 1.1 for mBCC (pEAS) |
---|---|
Description | Time to tumor response (TTR) is defined as the time from date of enrollment to the date of first documented tumor response (CR or PR). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary efficacy analysis set (pEAS) was a subset of the full analysis set (FAS) including patients with laBCC with tumors that were adequately assessed by MRI or photography or both, & including all patients with mBCC included in the FAS which comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 42 | 93 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
1.9
|
1.8
|
1.0
|
2.7
|
Title | Plasma Concentration of Sonidegib (LDE225) |
---|---|
Description | Blood PK samples were collected either by direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein for the determination of trough (Cmin) plasma concentrations of sonidegib and its main circulating metabolite, LGE899, from all patients who enrolled in the study. Blood was collected in Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9 (pre-dose), and subsequently pre-dose every 4 weeks up to Week 21, and every 12 weeks thereafter up to week 69. |
Time Frame | Weeks 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 33, 45, 57, 69 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The PK analysis set (PAS) consisted of all patients with at least one evaluable plasma concentration. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200 mg qd | LDE225 800 mg qd |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 73 | 139 |
Week 1 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
NA
(NA)
|
NA
(NA)
|
Week 3 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
207.76
(78.29)
|
586.76
(97.13)
|
Week 5 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
372.26
(68.89)
|
1012.63
(70.42)
|
Week 9 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
559.29
(67.30)
|
1353.06
(63.43)
|
Week 13 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
714.01
(60.79)
|
1443.84
(61.57)
|
Week 17 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
688.93
(64.43)
|
1574.21
(59.88)
|
Week 17 (1 h (post-dose)) |
841.78
(52.57)
|
1803.74
(39.47)
|
Week 17 (2 h (post-dose)) |
939.56
(50.79)
|
1922.38
(34.90)
|
Week 17 (4 h (post-dose)) |
842.31
(62.22)
|
1750.70
(53.32)
|
Week 17 (6 h (post-dose)) |
759.88
(63.43)
|
1673.95
(41.53)
|
Week 21 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
707.49
(63.58)
|
1547.41
(63.92)
|
Week 33 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
702.67
(93.11)
|
1477.60
(74.80)
|
Week 45 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
697.92
(76.02)
|
1368.87
(79.60)
|
Week 57 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
559.17
(117.27)
|
1257.42
(78.96)
|
Wek 69 (0 h (pre-dose)) |
530.91
(154.33)
|
1355.91
(89.03)
|
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause or the last date that a patient was known to be alive (censored observation) as of the data cut-off. |
Time Frame | 42 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set (FAS) comprised all patients who were assigned study treatment irrespective of receiving it (all randomized patients). Patients were classified according to the treatment they were assigned in accordance with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. |
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200mg laBCC | LDE225 800mg laBCC | LDE225 200mg mBCC | LDE225 800mg mBCC |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg laBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 200mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | The efficacy and safety of LDE225 800mg mBCC cohort were analyzed separately in each group. Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. |
Measure Participants | 66 | 128 | 13 | 23 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
NA
|
NA
|
47.6
|
33.8
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected for the maximum actual duration of treatment exposure and follow up for a participant per the protocol for approximately 76.2 months. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | All cause mortality (deaths) was collected for as long as participants could be contacted from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV) up to a maximum of approx. 7 years. | |||
Arm/Group Title | LDE225 200 mg qd | LDE225 800 mg qd | ||
Arm/Group Description | Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 200 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | Patients who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were treated with 800 mg LDE225 daily until disease progression, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, start of another anticancer treatment or withdrawal of consent. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
LDE225 200 mg qd | LDE225 800 mg qd | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/79 (1.3%) | 7/150 (4.7%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
LDE225 200 mg qd | LDE225 800 mg qd | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 16/79 (20.3%) | 58/150 (38.7%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 0/79 (0%) | 5/150 (3.3%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Angina pectoris | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Bradycardia | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Bundle branch block left | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Cardiac arrest | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Cardiac failure congestive | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Cardiovascular insufficiency | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Sinus tachycardia | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Chronic gastritis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Constipation | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Duodenal stenosis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Duodenal ulcer | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Gastric ulcer | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Gastritis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Gastritis erosive | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Gastrointestinal pain | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Nausea | 0/79 (0%) | 3/150 (2%) | ||
Pancreatitis acute | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Peptic ulcer perforation | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Small intestinal obstruction | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Vomiting | 0/79 (0%) | 4/150 (2.7%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Cardiac death | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Facial pain | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Non-cardiac chest pain | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Pain | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Hepatotoxicity | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Abscess | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Abscess limb | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Bronchitis | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Cellulitis | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Endocarditis | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Escherichia urinary tract infection | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Lower respiratory tract infection | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Mastoiditis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Otitis media | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Parotitis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Pneumonia | 2/79 (2.5%) | 3/150 (2%) | ||
Pseudomonas infection | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Sepsis | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Septic shock | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Superinfection | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 1/79 (1.3%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Arthropod bite | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Cervical vertebral fracture | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Fall | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Femoral neck fracture | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Joint dislocation | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Lumbar vertebral fracture | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Spinal fracture | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Upper limb fracture | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Blood creatine phosphokinase MB increased | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 1/79 (1.3%) | 6/150 (4%) | ||
Lipase increased | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Myoglobin blood increased | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Weight decreased | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Dehydration | 1/79 (1.3%) | 3/150 (2%) | ||
Failure to thrive | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Hypoglycaemia | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Muscle contracture | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Muscular weakness | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Myositis | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Osteonecrosis of jaw | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Rhabdomyolysis | 1/79 (1.3%) | 5/150 (3.3%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
B-cell lymphoma | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Basal cell carcinoma | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Brain neoplasm | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Invasive papillary breast carcinoma | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Lung neoplasm | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Malignant melanoma | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Prostate cancer | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Transitional cell carcinoma | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Dysgeusia | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Haemorrhage intracranial | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Paraesthesia | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Somnolence | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Syncope | 1/79 (1.3%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Bipolar disorder | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Mental status changes | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Acute kidney injury | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Bladder obstruction | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Haematuria | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Nephropathy toxic | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Uterine prolapse | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Bronchitis chronic | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 1/79 (1.3%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Emphysema | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Respiratory arrest | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Rhinorrhoea | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Sputum discoloured | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Skin lesion | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Arterial haemorrhage | 0/79 (0%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Deep vein thrombosis | 0/79 (0%) | 2/150 (1.3%) | ||
Hypotension | 1/79 (1.3%) | 1/150 (0.7%) | ||
Orthostatic hypotension | 1/79 (1.3%) | 0/150 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
LDE225 200 mg qd | LDE225 800 mg qd | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 76/79 (96.2%) | 145/150 (96.7%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 4/79 (5.1%) | 13/150 (8.7%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Vertigo | 0/79 (0%) | 11/150 (7.3%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 8/79 (10.1%) | 9/150 (6%) | ||
Abdominal pain upper | 7/79 (8.9%) | 12/150 (8%) | ||
Constipation | 6/79 (7.6%) | 24/150 (16%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 25/79 (31.6%) | 34/150 (22.7%) | ||
Dry mouth | 4/79 (5.1%) | 8/150 (5.3%) | ||
Nausea | 31/79 (39.2%) | 71/150 (47.3%) | ||
Vomiting | 9/79 (11.4%) | 41/150 (27.3%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 10/79 (12.7%) | 9/150 (6%) | ||
Fatigue | 26/79 (32.9%) | 55/150 (36.7%) | ||
Pyrexia | 4/79 (5.1%) | 5/150 (3.3%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Influenza | 4/79 (5.1%) | 8/150 (5.3%) | ||
Nasopharyngitis | 8/79 (10.1%) | 17/150 (11.3%) | ||
Pneumonia | 4/79 (5.1%) | 3/150 (2%) | ||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 5/79 (6.3%) | 11/150 (7.3%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 7/79 (8.9%) | 7/150 (4.7%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Fall | 5/79 (6.3%) | 5/150 (3.3%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 23/79 (29.1%) | 54/150 (36%) | ||
Lipase increased | 6/79 (7.6%) | 13/150 (8.7%) | ||
Weight decreased | 24/79 (30.4%) | 64/150 (42.7%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 18/79 (22.8%) | 52/150 (34.7%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 13/79 (16.5%) | 17/150 (11.3%) | ||
Back pain | 6/79 (7.6%) | 16/150 (10.7%) | ||
Muscle spasms | 43/79 (54.4%) | 104/150 (69.3%) | ||
Muscular weakness | 4/79 (5.1%) | 8/150 (5.3%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 4/79 (5.1%) | 7/150 (4.7%) | ||
Myalgia | 15/79 (19%) | 42/150 (28%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 5/79 (6.3%) | 8/150 (5.3%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 4/79 (5.1%) | 5/150 (3.3%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Ageusia | 1/79 (1.3%) | 15/150 (10%) | ||
Dizziness | 7/79 (8.9%) | 15/150 (10%) | ||
Dysgeusia | 35/79 (44.3%) | 89/150 (59.3%) | ||
Headache | 12/79 (15.2%) | 20/150 (13.3%) | ||
Hypogeusia | 0/79 (0%) | 9/150 (6%) | ||
Paraesthesia | 4/79 (5.1%) | 6/150 (4%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 5/79 (6.3%) | 9/150 (6%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Cough | 7/79 (8.9%) | 11/150 (7.3%) | ||
Oropharyngeal pain | 4/79 (5.1%) | 6/150 (4%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Alopecia | 39/79 (49.4%) | 87/150 (58%) | ||
Pruritus | 6/79 (7.6%) | 12/150 (8%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 8/79 (10.1%) | 16/150 (10.7%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Study Director |
---|---|
Organization | Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Phone | 862-778-8300 |
Novartis.email@novartis.com |
- CLDE225A2201
- 2010-022629-14