Study Comparing ABVD vs BEACOPP in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The choice of a preferred first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related effects. To fully assess this balance, the treatment decision process should ideally take into account the outcome following a consistent second-line therapy, in particular when tolerated, widely applicable and highly effective salvage regimens exist, like in Hodgkin lymphoma failing initial chemotherapy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
During the last two decades ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) has been considered as the standard of care for advanced HL, however 20-30% of the patients fail to achieve a durable complete remission and need a salvage treatment. After a state-of-the art-salvage program including high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support (ASCT) at least half of these patients achieve a durable disease control. Recently the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) has developed a new regimen, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone), administered with or without dose escalation. In an interim analysis after 23 months follow-up, BEACOPP demonstrated a higher activity compared to COPP/ABVD with a superior freedom from treatment failure (84% versus 75%, P=.034). Despite the improved efficacy a substantial proportion of patients receiving escalated BEACOPP experienced severe acute hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 leucopoenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 78% , 36% and 27% of the cycles administered, respectively) and 1.8% fatal acute toxicities were reported. Moreover of greater concern is the incidence of almost fatal secondary acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (3 cases in 323 patients). The choice of first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related toxicities. Long-term outcome following an optimal salvage treatment, consisting in high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT should also be taken into consideration. In the present study we plan to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two therapeutic strategies consisting in two different first-line treatments followed by a pre-planned salvage program, when indicated
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm B BEACOPP (Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) for 4 escalated cycles followed by 4 standard cycles |
Drug: Bleomycin
10 mg/m2 IV day 8 during cycles 1 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Etoposide
200 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 1 to 4; 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 5 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Doxorubicin
35 mg/2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 25 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Cyclophosphamide
1250 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 650 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Vincristine
1.4 mg/m2 iv (max 2 mg) on day 8 during cycles 1 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Procarbazine
100 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 7 during cycles 1 to 8
Other Names:
Drug: Prednisone
40 mg/m2 po from day 1 to 14 during cycles 1 to 8
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Arm A ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) for 6 to 8 cycles |
Drug: Doxorubicin
25 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other Names:
Drug: Bleomycin
10 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other Names:
Drug: Vinblastine
6 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other Names:
Drug: Dacarbazine
375 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 15 in each cycle
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Freedom from first progression at 5 years [After a median of 5 years from start of the study]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Freedom from second progression at 5 years [After a median of 5 years from start of protocol]
- Overall survival at 5 years [After a median of 5 years from start of the protocol]
- Number of participants with acute adverse events at initial therapy and at salvage therapy as a measure of safety and tolerability [After 3 months from last intervention]
- Number of participants long term sequelae [After a median of 10 years]
Number of participants who developed leukemia Number of participants who developed solid tumors Number of participants who developed cardiovascular disease
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma (pathological review diagnosis available)
-
No prior treatment
-
Stage II B, III A and B, IV A and B
-
Normal hematopoietic function as measured by leucocytes equal to or greater than 3500/mm3, neutrophils equal to or greater than 1500/mm3, platelets equal to or greater than 100000/mm3
-
Normal renal function (serum creatinine < 1,5x ULN) and normal liver function (SGOT/SGPT equal to or lower than 2.5x ULN; bilirubin equal to or lower than 1.5x ULN)
-
No significant history or current evidence of cardiovascular disease, or major respiratory disease
-
No severe neurologic or psychiatric disease
-
No other malignancy except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and/or in situ cervical carcinoma of the uterus
-
Serological negativity for hepatitis B or C or HIV infection
-
ECOG performance status equal to or lower than 2
-
Life expectancy of at least three months
-
Effective contraception in all patients and a negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential
-
Written informed consent and consent to a regular follow-up in the outpatient clinic
Exclusion criteria:
-
Sever central nervous system or psychiatric disease
-
History or current evidence of clinically significant cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction or severe arrhythmias. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% at rest by echocardiography or < 55% by isotopic measurement
-
Serological positivity for HBV, HCV or HIV
-
History or current evidence of malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix
-
Lactating or pregnant women
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Tumori di Milano | Milano | Italy |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Fondazione Michelangelo
Investigators
- Study Chair: Alessandro M Gianni, MD, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 41/99