rTMS Study in Depression to Evaluate the Relationship Between Brain Plasticity and Clinical Outcome

Sponsor
Stanford University (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT04032015
Collaborator
(none)
0
2
41

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Depression is a highly prevalent condition characterized by persistent low mood, energy, and activity that can affect one's thoughts, mood, behavior, and sense of well-being. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique, is an effective treatment for depression. However, remission rates are suboptimal and ideal stimulation parameters are unknown. The overarching goal of this study is to elucidate how brain changes accumulate during rTMS, and how these changes relate to clinical outcome. I plan to recruit patients with medication-resistant depression and treat with four weeks of rTMS in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled fashion. I will measure brain changes using TMS-EEG and determine how these changes relate to clinical outcome. This study will 1) test how brain changes relate to clinical outcome and 2) establish a computational model to help predict outcome and propose novel treatment protocols.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: TMS
N/A

Detailed Description

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder, but remission rates are 20-40%, and ideal stimulation parameters are unknown. rTMS is thought to work by changing the synaptic strength of neurons. The ability of our brain to make these changes is referred to as plasticity. rTMS-induced changes are thought to build with successive treatment sessions, a process referred to as metaplasticity. While both plasticity and metaplasticity are well-established in single cell physiology, relevance to rTMS in humans remains unknown. To improve clinical efficacy, the investigators seek to understand 1) the neural response to a single rTMS session (plasticity), 2) the neural response to repeated daily rTMS sessions (metaplasticity), and 3) whether computational models of plasticity based on single-cell physiology apply to human patients receiving rTMS for depression.

Goals of the study are as follows:
  1. establish a detailed mechanistic understanding of the brain changes during current rTMS treatment

  2. identify clinically meaningful electrophysiological biomarkers for rTMS treatment

  3. establish a computational model to help predict both brain and clinical changes.

This project tests the hypothesis that neural changes that accumulate during rTMS treatment can predict clinical outcome. Participants will first complete a screening procedure to determine eligibility based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. If the participants are not eligible, no further study procedures will be conducted. Eligible participants will be randomized to four weeks (20 sessions) of daily 10Hz left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) active or sham rTMS. Following the completion of sham treatment, participants will be offered open-label active rTMS treatment for four weeks to ensure that all participants receive active treatment if desired. Single pulse TMS-evoked potential (TEP), a well-studied causal EEG measure of brain excitability, will be measured before, during, and after every rTMS session. TEPs will be measured locally in the left lateral prefrontal cortex and compared to downstream sites in parietal and medial prefrontal cortex.

Aim 1: To determine the electrophysiological response to single and repeated rTMS sessions in depression. Through this aim, I will establish a detailed mechanistic understanding of the electrophysiological effects of rTMS treatments.

Aim 2: To determine the relationship between brain state, plasticity, metaplasticity, and antidepressant response in depression. Through this aim, I will identify clinically meaningful electrophysiological biomarkers for rTMS treatment.

Aim 3: To test whether a computational model of metaplasticity applies to human patients. This computational model will help predict both neurophysiological and clinical changes.

Findings from this study will provide the basis for novel stimulation protocols that will maximize clinically-relevant brain changes and improve clinical outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Randomized, Sham-controlled rTMS Trial in Depression to Evaluate the Relationship of Brain Plasticity and Clinical Outcome
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: rTMS treatment

rTMS will be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS will be delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own MRI images. Daily treatment regiments will last 30 minutes and rTMS will be delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants will be monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects.

Device: TMS
Device used to administer electromagnetic fields to the brain to alter connectivity patterns

Sham Comparator: Sham treatment

Sham rTMS will be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. To maximize sham validity, both 1) a direction-sensor TMS coil will alert the operators to flip the coil if the wrong side is being used, and 2) low-intensity 10Hz electrical stimulation will be applied to scalp electrodes under the coil for sham and placed but not activated in the active arm. The rTMS coil will be positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own MRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments will last 30 minutes and sham rTMS will be delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants will be monitored during the sham rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the 20 sham sessions, participants are unblinded and offered 20 treatments of active rTMS. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol.

Device: TMS
Device used to administer electromagnetic fields to the brain to alter connectivity patterns

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. TMS-EEG change [Up to 1 month]

    Change in TMS-EEG measures will be assessed before, during, and after each treatment session. These changes will be compared to clinical outcome to identify clinically-relevant biomarkers.

  2. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HamD) [Up to 6 months after treatment]

    Clinician administered scale to assess depression is a 24-item clinician-administered assessment utilized as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • English-speaking

  • Right-handed

  • Ages 18-65

  • Depression diagnosis as assessed through an in-depth interview

  • Failed at least 1 antidepressant medication

  • Without current/history of neurological disorders or seizures or risk of seizures

Exclusion Criteria:
  • A contraindication for MRIs (e.g. implanted metal)

  • History of head trauma with loss of consciousness

  • History of seizures

  • Neurological or uncontrolled medical disease

  • Active substance abuse

  • Diagnosis of psychotic or bipolar disorder

  • Prior history of ECT or rTMS failure

  • Currently taking medications that substantially reduce seizure threshold

  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stanford University

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Corey Keller, Principal Investigator, Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04032015
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 133611
First Posted:
Jul 25, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Apr 14, 2021
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 14, 2021