ReDeeMD: Repetitive Versus Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression

Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05902312
Collaborator
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Other)
220
2
60

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to he effectiveness of two different TMS techniques in TRD, repetitive TMS (rTMS) and deep TMS (dTMS). The main questions it aims to answer are:

type of study: clinical trial participant population/health conditions : Major Depressive Disorder To assess the superiority of dTMS over rTMS in TRD To evaluate the predictive capacity of scalable candidate biomarkers Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two intervention groups (rTMS or dTMS).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
N/A

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two different TMS techniques in TRD, repetitive TMS (rTMS) and deep TMS (dTMS). Compared to rTMS, dTMS delivers a broader magnetic field, which in turn reduces coil positioning error and maximizes the probability of optimal cortical stimulation. A past RCT comparing both approaches found a greater depression score decrease and response/remission rates for dTMS, but was short of reaching significance for remission rates (primary outcome). Critical components of this RCT were suboptimal, including too few treatment sessions and insufficient statistical power, both of which could have obscured an actual difference between modalities. Proof of a more effective type of TMS over another would translate into increased odds of improvement for TRD patients who live with a chronic and disabling illness.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
220 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
randomized, single-center, two-arm, parallel-group superiority trialrandomized, single-center, two-arm, parallel-group superiority trial
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Given the study's design, blinding participants and TMS operators will not be possible. Still, staff responsible for participant assessments and data analysis will be blinded to treatment conditions and external to the clinic staff. Patients will be instructed not to reveal their group assignment to the raters. Patients will not be given the specifics of the treatment parameters and will be instructed not to talk to each other during the study period. Both treatments will be presented as effective to them. Lastly, the data management center will strictly control access to the randomization code.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparative Effectiveness of Repetitive Versus Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2028

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

rTMS on a MagPro X100 research grade stimulator (MagVenture) equipped with a B70 fluid-cooled coil. Participant will receive the MDD FDA-approved iTBS protocol (triplet 50 Hz bursts repeated at 5 Hz, 2 s ON and 8 s OFF; 600 pulses per session; total duration of 3 min 9 s, 120% hand motor threshold)

Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Participants will receive either rTMS or dTMS
Other Names:
  • deep transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Experimental: deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    dTMS on a research Brainsway system equipped with an H7-Coil. Participants will receive the MDD FDA-cleared 18 Hz stimulation protocol (2 sec ON, 20 sec OFF, 55 trains; 1980 pulses per session; 20 min 10 s duration; 120% hand motor threshold)

    Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Participants will receive either rTMS or dTMS
    Other Names:
  • deep transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 (HRSD-17) [Baseline to Week 6]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 53)

    2. Response (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [baseline to Week 6]

      Defined as a score reduction of 50% or more

    3. Remission (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Week 6]

      Defined as a score of 7 or less

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 7]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 53)

    2. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 10]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 53)

    3. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 53)

    4. Response (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 7]

      Defined as a score reduction of 50% or more

    5. Response (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 10]

      Defined as a score reduction of 50% or more

    6. Response (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 18]

      Defined as a score reduction of 50% or more

    7. Remission (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 7]

      Defined as a score of 7 or less

    8. Remission (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 10]

      Defined as a score of 7 or less

    9. Remission (yes/no) on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 [Baseline to Week 18]

      Defined as a score of 7 or less

    10. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-28 [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 90)

    11. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 56)

    12. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (self-report) (QIDS-SR 16) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 42)

    13. General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 21)

    14. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min= 0, Max = 56)

    15. Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 30)

    16. Rumination Response Scale (RRS) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score change. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 88)

    17. Adult AHDH Self-Report Scale [Baseline to Week 18]

      qualitative.

    18. McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder [Baseline]

      score. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 10)

    19. World Health Organization Quality of Life Short Version (WHOQOL-BREF) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      Difference score. Lower score means worse outcome. (Min = 26, Max = 130)

    20. Cognitive Difficulties Scale (MacNair-R) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      Difference score. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 156)

    21. Memory Complaints Scale (MacNair) [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 45)

    22. Sheehan Disability Scale [Baseline to Week 6, Week 7, Week 10, Week 18]

      score. Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 30)

    23. Visual Pain Scale [Each treatment day]

      Maximum score (during treatment). Higher score means worse outcome. (Min = 0, Max = 10).

    24. Sex and Gender scale [Baseline]

      Descriptive statistics

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Electroencephalogram to predict treatment response [Baseline]

      individual alpha frequency

    2. Electroencephalogram event-related potentials [Baseline]

      Reward positivity

    3. Electrocardiogram [Baseline]

      corrected QT interval

    4. Neuro Cardiac Guided TMS [Baseline]

      measure of heart rate deceleration to treatment

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    21 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, at least moderate intensity, single or recurrent episode

    • HRSD-17 score of at least 18

    • No improvement to at least two adequate courses of antidepressants (based on the ATHF) or were unable to tolerate at least two separate trials of antidepressants of inadequate dose and duration

    • On a stable antidepressant regimen for the past four weeks before screening

    • Patients with a chronic depressive episode >2 years and who have previously received ECT or ketamine will be eligible to participate

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Having previously received TMS;

    • Substance use disorder within the last three months

    • Diagnosis of bipolar or psychosis spectrum disorder

    • Anxiety or personality disorder that is assessed by a study investigator to be the primary cause and causing greater impairment than MDD

    • Concomitant major unstable medical or neurological illness

    • Intracranial implant, cardiac pacemaker or implanted medication pump

    • Significant laboratory abnormality;

    • Active suicidal intent

    • Pregnancy

    • If participating in psychotherapy, must have been in stable treatment for at least three months before entry into the study, with no anticipation of change

    • Currently taking more than the equivalent of 2 mg of lorazepam of a benzodiazepine daily or any dose of an anticonvulsant due to the potential to limit TMS effectiveness

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
    • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Jean-Philippe Miron, MD PhD, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05902312
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2023-11389
    First Posted:
    Jun 13, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 13, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2023
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 13, 2023